Literature DB >> 18587306

A comparison of injection pain with articaine with adrenaline, prilocaine with phenylpressin and lidocaine with adrenaline.

Mahmut Sumer1, Ferhat Misir, Nükhet Celebi, Mehtap Muğlali.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to investigate the pain on injection of articaine with adrenaline, prilocaine with phenylpressin , and lidocaine with adrenaline. STUDY
DESIGN: The study sample was comprised of 497 consecutively seen patients received 497 maxillary buccal infiltration injections or inferior alveolar block injections of 4% articaine with 1:200.000 adrenaline, 3% prilocaine with 1.08 mcg phenylpressin, or 2% lidocaine with 1:100.000 adrenaline. Immediately after the injection, patients were asked to rate their injection pain on a six-point scale.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the anesthetic solutions for injection pain. Patients usually reported mild or no injection pain for all of anesthetic administrations.
CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study that lidocaine with adrenaline, articaine with adrenaline and prilocaine with phenylpressin seemed to be similar for pain on injection and they could be quite painless.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18587306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal        ISSN: 1698-4447


  6 in total

1.  The Effect of 2 Injection Speeds on Local Anesthetic Discomfort During Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks.

Authors:  Marcelo Rodrigo de Souza Melo; Mark Jon Santana Sabey; Carla Juliane Lima; Liane Maciel de Almeida Souza; Francisco Carlos Groppo
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2015

2.  Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.

Authors:  Deepashri H Kambalimath; R S Dolas; H V Kambalimath; S M Agrawal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-04-05

Review 3.  Various strategies for pain-free root canal treatment.

Authors:  Masoud Parirokh; Paul V Abbott
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-12-24

4.  Pain perception and efficacy of local analgesia using 2% lignocaine, buffered lignocaine, and 4% articaine in pediatric dental procedures.

Authors:  Afsal M M; Amit Khatri; Namita Kalra; Rishi Tyagi; Deepak Khandelwal
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-04-30

5.  Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study.

Authors:  Nikil Kumar Jain; Reena Rachel John
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2016 May-Aug

6.  Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1st Molar.

Authors:  D Prasanna Kumar; Mandeep Sharma; Vinay Patil; Rohit Singh Subedar; G Vijaya Lakshmi; Nithin Varalakonda Manjunath
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.