Literature DB >> 18586738

Assessment and improvement of the Plasmodium yoelii yoelii genome annotation through comparative analysis.

Ashley Vaughan1, Sum-Ying Chiu, Gowthaman Ramasamy, Ling Li, Malcolm J Gardner, Alice S Tarun, Stefan H I Kappe, Xinxia Peng.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The sequencing of the Plasmodium yoelii genome, a model rodent malaria parasite, has greatly facilitated research for the development of new drug and vaccine candidates against malaria. Unfortunately, only preliminary gene models were annotated on the partially sequenced genome, mostly by in silico gene prediction, and there has been no major improvement of the annotation since 2002.
RESULTS: Here we report on a systematic assessment of the accuracy of the genome annotation based on a detailed analysis of a comprehensive set of cDNA sequences and proteomics data. We found that the coverage of the current annotation tends to be biased toward genes expressed in the blood stages of the parasite life cycle. Based on our proteomic analysis, we estimate that about 15% of the liver stage proteome data we have generated is absent from the current annotation. Through comparative analysis we identified and manually curated a further 510 P. yoelii genes which have clear orthologs in the P. falciparum genome, but were not present or incorrectly annotated in the current annotation. This study suggests that improvements of the current P. yoelii genome annotation should focus on genes expressed in stages other than blood stages. Comparative analysis will be critically helpful for this re-annotation. The addition of newly annotated genes will facilitate the use of P. yoelii as a model system for studying human malaria. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18586738      PMCID: PMC2718618          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 INTRODUCTION

Malaria, a disease that causes more than 500 million clinical cases each year and kills more than 1 million worldwide in developing countries, is caused by unicellular Plasmodium parasites (Snow et al., 2005). Plasmodium is an obligatory intracellular parasite and its progression through the life cycle involves invasion of and intracellular replication in different tissues of both the mosquito vector and the mammalian host. Within the mammalian host, mousquito-inoculated salivary gland sporozoites of the parasite invade the liver and undergo an intracellular replication phase (schizogony) to produce merozoite stages that are competent for red blood cell infection. This initial blood stage infection establishes the blood stage cycle responsible for the pathology of malaria. Facilitated by the P. falciparum genome sequencing project (Gardner et al., 2002), the genome of Plasmodium yoelii was sequenced to 5-fold genome coverage using the whole-genome shotgun sequencing approach and was annotated in 2002 (Carlton et al., 2002). Comparative genome analysis has revealed high gene sequence similarities and genome-wide synteny among the human parasite P. falciparum and the rodent malaria models (Kooij et al., 2005; Roy and Hartl, 2006). P. yoelii is an important animal model for studying malaria biology, particularly of the liver stages and host–parasite interactions. The P. yoelii pre-erythrocytic infection of the mouse represents an accepted model closely reflecting human malaria (Luke and Hoffman, 2003). It is also a better model than the rodent model P. berghei for studying the elusive liver stages because it induces less inflammation in murine livers and produces more liver stage parasites (Tarun et al., 2006). The partial genome sequencing approach has enabled the development of genome-wide approaches such as microarrays and proteomics to study parasite biology (Tarun et al., 2008). However, the genes in the P. yoelii genome database were mostly identified by in silico gene prediction and there is an inherent propensity for error using this methodology, especially when the genome is AT rich. For example, the P. yoelii S4 gene (Kaiser et al., 2004) is not included in the current annotation. Instead, a three-exon gene (PY00180 in PlasmoDB, http://www.plasmodb.org) is annotated on the opposite strand in the same genomic location. Later, S4 was reported to mediate parasite infection in its mosquito and vertebrate hosts (Kariu et al., 2006), clearly demonstrating the importance of this un-annotated gene in parasite lifecycle progression. A recent study estimated that ∼24% of the annotated P. falciparum genes contain errors of varying severity (Lu et al., 2007). Since the P. yoelii genome was partially sequenced and therefore not fully assembled, the error rate in the gene annotation is likely to be even higher when compared to the annotation of the fully sequenced and assembled P. falciparum genome (Salzberg, 2007). As an example of this error rate, the intensely studied gene encoding the circumsporozoite protein (Kumar et al., 2006) has been incorrectly annotated as two partial genes in the P. yoelii genome annotation (PY07368 and PY03168 in PlasmoDB). The inaccurate annotation of the P. yoelii genome greatly compromises genome-wide studies. Thus, there is clearly a need for an updated and accurately annotated P. yoelii genome sequence. Fortunately, additional Plasmodium species have been sequenced (Hall et al., 2005), or are being sequenced (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/e2k1/pva1/). Furthermore, the Plasmodium cDNA sequences available in Genbank have also grown dramatically since 2002. These provide an opportunity to examine the existing P. yoelii genome annotation using comparative analysis, to improve the current annotation and to discover missed genes. Here we describe a systematic assessment of the current P. yoelii annotation based on the publicly available cDNA sequence data and locally generated proteomic data. Based on the comparative analysis of published Plasmodium genome sequences, we have identified and manually curated 510 P. yoelii genes that have clear orthologs in P. falciparum, but are absent or incorrectly annotated in the current database. The improved annotation will greatly facilitate the use of the rodent malaria system in the modeling of human Plasmodium biology.

2 METHODS

2.1 cDNA sequence trimming and assembly

All Plasmodium expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences were downloaded from Genbank (August 2, 2007). To identify segments of EST sequences of vector origin, EST sequences were blasted against NCBI's UniVec Database using similar parameters as VecScreen (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/VecScreen/VecScreen.html). Segments of vector origin were trimmed and only sequences with at least 100 bp were used. Trimmed EST sequences were then blasted against Plasmodium ribosomal gene sequences. Possible ribosomal RNA sequences were identified (with a match to a ribosomal gene of 40 bp or longer with a minimum of 90% identity) and removed. The ESTs of possible host origin were similarly identified and removed. The remaining EST sequences were clustered and assembled using TGI clustering tools (Pertea et al., 2003). Consensus sequences (contigs) were built based on two or more EST sequences that overlap for at least 40 bases with at least 94% sequence identity. These strict criteria helped to minimize the creation of chimeric contigs.

2.2 Proteomics analysis

Proteomics data were generated as described (Tarun et al., 2008). In brief, liver stage-infected hepatocytes were isolated from GFP-expressing P. yoelii-infected BALB/c mice by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Total protein was extracted from sorted liver stage-infected hepatocytes and separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were cut from the gel and digested in-gel with sequencing grade-modified trypsin. Mass spectra were obtained by nano-flow liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nano LC-MS/MS). In an attempt to account for missing, partial or erroneous P. yoelii gene models, we assembled two additional databases besides a standard sequence database that combined the currently annotated P. yoelii protein sequences with the currently annotated Mus musculus protein sequences. The first database was assembled with annotated P. berghei protein sequences (PlasmoDB version 5.2) supplemented with M.musculus protein sequences. The M.musculus genome database was downloaded from the NCBI FTP site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) on May 4, 2006. We constructed a second database to search for additional peptides that might not be found using current annotations. To do this, we translated all the P. yoelii genomic sequences downloaded from Genbank in all six frames and extracted all stop-to-stop open reading frames (ORFs). We used this approach since many P. yoelii genes have multiple exons and thus, not all peptides will be identified by searching a straightforward six-frame translation for contiguous sequences that contain start and stop codons. For instance, those peptides spanning exon boundaries will be missed with a standard six-frame ORF search, but they are critical for confirming and annotating splicing. To overcome the limitations of this straight-forward search, we also translated both the contigs and singlets derived from the EST analysis as described above in all six frames and again extracted all stop-to-stop ORFs and added these peptides to the second database. The six-frame translation was achieved using the EMBOSS package (Rice et al., 2000). All ORFs over 30 amino acids are merged. Redundant entries were removed using the WU-BLAST package [Gish W. (1996–2004) http://blast.wustl.edu]. This second sequence database was supplemented with M.musculus protein sequences as before. The nano LC-MS/MS data (Tarun et al., 2008) were searched against each of the three sequence databases separately using BioworksBrowser 3.1 SR1 (San Jose, CA, ThermoElectron), which uses the SEQUEST algorithm (Eng et al., 1994). The search results were validated using PeptideProphet version 3.0 (Keller et al., 2002) for peptide identification. The PeptideProphet program scores the assignment of a particular MS spectrum to a known peptide. We considered only those PeptideProphet scores with a minimum P-value of 0.85, which in this case corresponds to a probability >98% of the peptide being correct. Depending on the database used for the analysis, single MS spectra could be assigned to different peptides. We kept only those spectra to which all peptides assigned were similar (in this case, they had no more than two amino acid differences between them). A total of 12 276 spectra with a minimum P-value of 0.85 were successfully assigned to Plasmodium protein sequences and 585 of the 12276 were assigned with two or more different peptides. Where common peptides differed slightly, a single representative peptide for each spectrum was chosen. Identified peptides were then mapped to the annotated P. yoelii protein sequences, genomic DNA sequences and EST sequences using tools provided by EMBOSS (Rice et al., 2000).

2.3 Orthology mapping

To identify P. yoelii genes that were not included in the original annotation or incorrectly annotated, we created a database of homologous proteins, which mapped proteins from four Plasmodium species (P. falciparum, P. yoelii, P. berghei and P. chabaudi) into one-to-one orthologous relationships. The annotated protein sequences of the four Plasmodium species were downloaded from PlasmoDB version 5.2. All pair-wise comparisons among protein sequences from any two of the four genomes were performed using NCBI BLAST. For each protein, the best hit in each of the other genomes was detected. Orthologous proteins from two genomes were defined as reciprocal best hits (BLAST E-value < 1e-15 as cutoff).

2.4 Protein features

Signal peptides were predicted using the SignalP 3.0 Server (Bendtsen et al., 2004) and only ORFs with a start codon were considered. Transmembrane domains were predicted using TMHMM Server v. 2.0 (Krogh et al., 2001). For Pfam domain annotations, protein sequences were searched against the Interpro database Release 15.0 (Mulder et al., 2007) using InterProScan web service.

2.5 PCR verification of newly annotated genes

Genomic and total RNA were prepared from mixed blood stage parasites obtained from mice infected with P. yoelii at 3–5% parasitemia. Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy kit (Valencia, CA, Qiagen) while total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Carlsbad, CA, Invitrogen) according to manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was treated with Turbo-free RNAse-free DNAse (Austin, TX, Ambion) to remove contaminating genomic DNA in the preparation. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA using the Superscript III Platinum RT kit (Invitrogen). For each 25 μl PCR reaction, genomic DNA (25 ng) or cDNA (from 5 ng of total RNA) was used as template with 25 pmol of the forward and reverse primers (Table 5) and 12.5 μl of the Bioline Red PCR mix (Randolph, MA, Bioline) using the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95○C for 3 min; 30 cycles of 94○C for 30 s, 55○C for 45 s and 72○C for 1 min; final extension of 72○C for 7 min.
Table 5.

Summary characteristics of re-annotated orthologous P. yoelii genes

CategoryRe-annotated genes
Total number510
Span two or more Contigs109
AAs (Mean, Min, Max)310, 19, 4783
Transmembrane domain116
Signal peptide80
EST hit452
Pfam domain157

3 RESULTS

3.1 Assessment of the P. yoelii genome annotation using cDNA sequences

EST sequences have been shown to be a powerful aid in Plasmodium gene identification and genome annotation (Carlton et al., 2002; Gardner et al., 2002; Hall et al., 2005; Li et al., 2003). Since the publication of the annotated P. yoelii genome in 2002 (Carlton et al., 2002), the number of Plasmodium cDNA sequences has increased dramatically (Table 1). In October 2002, there were 39 848 Plasmodium ESTs in Genbank. By August 2007, this number had increased by ∼350% to 138 827. Of note, is the generation of liver stage EST libraries (Ishino et al., GenBank accession DC195411-DC201252; Sacci et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2004). The liver stage has historically been extremely difficult to study (Blair and Carucci, 2005), but new tools have enabled isolation of rodent liver stages for analysis. The enrichment of Plasmodium cDNA sequences from all life stages has allowed us to examine the current P. yoelii annotation in far greater detail than previously possible.
Table 1.

Summary of the enrichment and pre-processing of Plasmodium EST data from Genbank

Organism10/20028/2007CleanedContigs (No. of ESTs)SingletsTotalYear of CoveragePublicationNo. of full-length genes
All four Plasmodium39 848138 827121 30815 605 (93 558)27 75043 355
P. yoelii15 56218 93218 3192401 (12 293)6026842720025878
P. berghei554458 95543 6655379 (32 528)11 13716 51620055864
P. falciparum18 74238 70237 9595118 (30 875)708412 202200214.5×5268
P.vivax022 23821 3652707 (17 862)3503621020055698
Summary of the enrichment and pre-processing of Plasmodium EST data from Genbank We downloaded all available Plasmodium ESTs from Genbank, cleaned them, and then assembled them into large contigs after clustering (Table 1). We then mapped the contigs and singlets onto the current P. yoelii genome annotation by sequence similarity analysis using NCBI BLAST (an E-value <1e-15 cutoff was used). We classified the annotated genes into two categories (Table 2). A gene was considered as ‘complete’ if its annotated coding sequence (CDS) contained a start and stop codon. Otherwise the gene was considered ‘partial’. Having EST evidence suggests that the annotated gene is very likely to encode a transcript. However, the exact boundaries of the gene cannot be verified explicitly unless an EST or EST contig contains a full length CDS. As shown in Table 2, longer gene sequences were better supported by an EST. It is possible that longer annotated genes were more likely to have representative ESTs. It is also possible that smaller genes were more likely to be incorrectly annotated, since short CDSs are more challenging for accurate computational prediction. When genes were of similar sizes, the gene was more likely to have a representative EST if its annotation was complete, rather than partial (Table 2). This implies that complete gene models are more likely to be correctly annotated.
Table 2.

Overview of the available EST evidence for 7861 currently annotated and 510 re-annotated P. yoelii CDS

Shorter thanComplete
Partial
Re-annotated
Totalw ESTPercentageTotalw ESTPercentageTotalw ESTPercentage
Total5904476681195710955651045289
200 aa1826962539462372524822089
180 aa1676832509102142421318989
160 aa1509690468741822118215987
140 aa1355558418441611914912886
120 aa118041235797126161079286
100 aa1015286287609913746486
80 aa86118021706669423583
Overview of the available EST evidence for 7861 currently annotated and 510 re-annotated P. yoelii CDS We found that there were significant numbers of P. yoelii ESTs that were not mapped to currently annotated P. yoelii CDSs (Table 3). Some un-mapped ESTs are likely to correspond to the untranslated regions of genes (both 5′ and 3′), since only CDSs were used in the analysis. Interestingly there were relatively more ESTs from liver stage libraries that were not mapped to any annotated P. yoelii CDSs compared to those ESTs from blood stages (Table 3). About 50% of the liver stage EST sequences were not mapped, while only about 13% of blood stage EST sequences were not mapped. This suggests that the current annotation has a better coverage of transcripts expressed in blood stages than those expressed in liver stages.
Table 3.

Summary of mapping P. yoelii ESTs to annotated P. yoelii CDSs

cDNA libraryTotalCleanedMappedUnmapped (%)
Asexual blood stages12 47112 04310 4741569 (13)
Salivary gland sporozoite3091307220051067 (34.7)
Axenic early liver stages (<24 h; trophozoite)14521387681706 (50.9)
Liver stage (40 h; schizont)19161815845970 (53.4)

Highlighted in bold are the percentage of ESTs from liver stage libraries which were not mapped to any annotated P. yoelii CDSs.

Summary of mapping P. yoelii ESTs to annotated P. yoelii CDSs Highlighted in bold are the percentage of ESTs from liver stage libraries which were not mapped to any annotated P. yoelii CDSs.

3.2 Assessment of the P. yoelii genome annotation by proteomic analysis

To further investigate the impact of current annotations on the studies of liver stage parasites, we used proteome data we generated from purified P. yoelii liver stages (Tarun et al., 2008). Since there is a high level of sequence similarity (91.3% identity at nucleotide level) between the P. yoelii and P. berghei genomes (Kooij et al., 2005), we hypothesized that a number of missing P. yoelii protein annotations would also be found by searching the annotated genome of the closely related P. berghei. We prepared a protein sequence database that included the annotated P. berghei protein sequences from the 4× coverage genome sequences (Hall et al., 2005) and the updated mouse protein sequences from NCBI. We then searched the spectra generated from our liver stage P. yoelii samples against this combined database. In total, 2644 unique P. berghei peptides were identified that had matches with our P. yoelii liver stage proteome data (Table 4 and Fig. 1). Only 87 (3.3%) of the peptides could not be perfectly mapped to any available P. yoelii sequence, suggesting that database searching P. berghei sequences or sequences from related Plasmodium species will supplement available P. yoelii annotations. Of the 2644 peptides, 2308 (87%), 2331 (88%) and 1666 (63%) peptides were perfectly mapped to P. yoelii annotated CDSs (PyCDS), genomic DNA (PyGdna) and EST (PyEST) sequences, respectively (Table 4). A total of 2249 peptides perfectly mapped to Plasmodium ESTs (Table 4, PlasEST) and of those, 952 matched to ESTs from three liver stage libraries (Table 4): PyLCM (Sacci et al., 2005), PyAxenic (Wang et al., 2004) and PbLS31 (Ishino et al. GenBank accession DC195411-DC201252). Of the 952 liver stage matched ESTs, 112 did not have a perfect match to any annotated P. yoelii proteins—about 12%. Similar estimations could be obtained when individual liver stage libraries were considered separately (9.6% for PyLCM, 11.5% for PyAxenic and 12.1% for PbLS31). Since the P. berghei genome sequence was only 4× coverage, we hypothesized that additional peptides were not identified by this analysis. The complete list of identified peptides is shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Table 4.

Analysis of peptides identified in liver stage by proteomics using different databases

Summary
Peptides mapped to P. yoelii CDSs, genomic sequences, ESTs and plasmodium ESTs (%)
Peptides mapped to P. yoelii or P. berghei ESTs from liver stage librariesa
TotalNot in Py (%)bPyCDSPyGdnaPyESTPlasESTPlasESTLSPyLCMPyAxenicPbLS31
PbCDS264487 (3.3)2308 (87.3)2331 (88.2)1666(63)2249 (85.1)952240156862
112 (11.8)23 (9.6)18 (11.5)104 (12.1)
6f3512244 (6.9)2813 (80.1)3006 (85.6)2002(57)2763 (78.7)993284199805
148 (14.9)46 (16.2)30 (15.1)115 (14.3)
PyCDS3459NA3459 (NA)3331 (96.3)2191 (63.3)2687 (77.7)1005300196810
NANANANA
Combinedc4234309 (7.3)3547 (83.8)3717 (87.8)2453 (57.9)3264 (77.1)1190355238963
172 (14.5)48 (13.5)35 (14.7)138 (14.3)

aHighlighted in bold and italics are the number (and the percentage) of peptides identified which can be mapped to ESTs from the indicated liver stage library, but not to any annotated P. yoelii protein sequence.

bThe number (and the percentage) of peptides identified in each database search which cannot be mapped to any P. yoelii sequence in any of PyCDS, PyGdna and PyEST.

cThe total number of peptides (non-redundant) identified from all three database searches.

PyCDS: annotated P. yoelii protein sequences. 6f: protein sequences from translation of P. yoelii genomic sequences and all Plasmodium EST sequences in six-frames. PbCDS: annotated P. berghei protein sequences. PyGdna: P. yoelii genomic sequences. PyEST: P. yoelii EST sequences. PlasEST: all Plasmodium EST sequences. PyLCM: P. yoelii EST sequences from Sacci et al. (2005). PyAxenic: P. yoelii EST sequences from Wang et al. (2004). PbLS31: P. berghei EST sequences from (Ishino et al. GenBank accession DC195411-DC201252). PlasESTLS: liver EST sequences from three liver stage libraries: PyLCM, PyAxenic and PbLS31. NA: not applicable. See text for details.

Fig. 1.

Venn diagram of peptides identified using different sequence databases. (A) Total number of peptides identified in each database search. (B) The subset of peptides identified which can be mapped to a P. yoelii sequence in any of PyCDS, PyGdna and PyEST. PyCDS, 6f, PbCDS, PyGdna and PyEST: see Table 4 legend.

Venn diagram of peptides identified using different sequence databases. (A) Total number of peptides identified in each database search. (B) The subset of peptides identified which can be mapped to a P. yoelii sequence in any of PyCDS, PyGdna and PyEST. PyCDS, 6f, PbCDS, PyGdna and PyEST: see Table 4 legend. Analysis of peptides identified in liver stage by proteomics using different databases aHighlighted in bold and italics are the number (and the percentage) of peptides identified which can be mapped to ESTs from the indicated liver stage library, but not to any annotated P. yoelii protein sequence. bThe number (and the percentage) of peptides identified in each database search which cannot be mapped to any P. yoelii sequence in any of PyCDS, PyGdna and PyEST. cThe total number of peptides (non-redundant) identified from all three database searches. PyCDS: annotated P. yoelii protein sequences. 6f: protein sequences from translation of P. yoelii genomic sequences and all Plasmodium EST sequences in six-frames. PbCDS: annotated P. berghei protein sequences. PyGdna: P. yoelii genomic sequences. PyEST: P. yoelii EST sequences. PlasEST: all Plasmodium EST sequences. PyLCM: P. yoelii EST sequences from Sacci et al. (2005). PyAxenic: P. yoelii EST sequences from Wang et al. (2004). PbLS31: P. berghei EST sequences from (Ishino et al. GenBank accession DC195411-DC201252). PlasESTLS: liver EST sequences from three liver stage libraries: PyLCM, PyAxenic and PbLS31. NA: not applicable. See text for details. To search for additional peptides that were not identified because of the limitations of the current annotations, we compiled a second protein sequence database. The second database contained: (1) all stop-to-stop ORFs over 30 amino acids after translating available P. yoelii genomic sequences from Genbank in six-frames, (2) stop-to-stop ORFs over 30 amino acids after translating pre-processed Plasmodium cDNA contigs and singlets in all six-frames and (3) the updated mouse protein sequences. The peptides were identified in the same way as above with this combined sequence database. In total, 3512 unique peptides were identified (Table 4 and Fig. 1). Of these 3512 peptides, 2763 mapped perfectly to Plasmodium ESTs and 993 perfectly mapped to ESTs from liver stage libraries (PyLCM, PyAxenic and PbLS31). However, as was seen with the P. berghei database search, a certain percentage of peptides that matched to liver stage ESTs did not have a perfect match with the current P. yoelii protein annotation (15%, 148 of 993). As before, we obtained similar estimations when individual liver stage libraries were considered separately (16% for PyLCM, 15.1% for PyAxenic and 14.3% for PbLS31). Since the second sequence database was more comprehensive compared to the annotated P. berghei sequence database, and used sequences from the same species that the proteome data came from (P. yoelii), we consider this estimation to be closer to the actual situation. Thus, 15% of our liver stage proteome data that matches available liver stage EST data is not contained in the current P. yoelii annotation, suggesting that a significant number of P. yoelii genes/exons are not represented in the current annotation. There were 406 peptides were identified by searching annotated P. berghei protein sequences but not translated P. yoelii genome (Fig. 1B), showing that database searching of sequences from related Plasmodium species can supplement the partially sequenced P. yoelii genome. The complete list of identified peptides is shown in Supplementary Table 1.

3.3 Identification of missing and incorrectly annotated P. yoelii genes by comparative analysis

To identify missing and incorrectly annotated genes in the annotated P. yoelii genome we took advantage of the recent genome publication of two closely related rodent Plasmodium species—P. berghei and P.chabaudi (Hall et al., 2005). Additional species such as P.vivax and P.knowlesi are also being sequenced. These additional sequences provide a great opportunity to improve current annotation by comparative analysis. Because rodent malaria parasites are used as model systems for studying human malaria parasites, we chose to focus on those genes that are well conserved between the human malaria parasite P. falciparum and the three rodent malaria parasites (P. yoelii, P. berghei and P. chabaudi) using the reciprocal best BLAST hit approach (Tatusov et al., 1997). First we identified a core set of genes conserved between P. falciparum and three rodent malaria parasites. Centered around P. falciparum proteins, we classified the mapping of orthologous proteins into six categories in the following order (Fig. 2): (1) those with three-way best BLAST hits among proteins from P. yoelii, P. berghei and P. falciparum (3285 proteins), (2) two-way best BLAST hits between proteins from P. falciparum and P. yoelii and P. falciparum and P. berghei only (271 proteins), (3) two-way best BLAST hits between only P. falciparum and P. yoelii (299 proteins) (4) two-way best BLAST hits between proteins from only P. falciparum and P. berghei (431 proteins), (5) two-way best BLAST hits between proteins from P. yoelii and P. berghei only (574 proteins) and (6) the two-way best BLAST hits between proteins from P. falciparum and P.chabaudi.
Fig. 2.

The strategy for the identification of orthologous P. yoelii genes potentially absent from the current annotation by comparative analysis. Orthologous genes from four Plasmodium species were identified based on the reciprocal best BLAST hit approach, and classified into six categories. Py: P. yoelii. Pb: P. berghei. Pf: P. falciparum. Pc: P.chabaudi. Solid lines with two arrows indicate proteins from two corresponding species are reciprocal best blast hits. The number on the left indicates the number of orthologous groups in each category. The asterisk indicates the orthologous groups from which potential P. yoelii genes orthologous to P. falciparum genes were identified (also highlighted in bold).

The strategy for the identification of orthologous P. yoelii genes potentially absent from the current annotation by comparative analysis. Orthologous genes from four Plasmodium species were identified based on the reciprocal best BLAST hit approach, and classified into six categories. Py: P. yoelii. Pb: P. berghei. Pf: P. falciparum. Pc: P.chabaudi. Solid lines with two arrows indicate proteins from two corresponding species are reciprocal best blast hits. The number on the left indicates the number of orthologous groups in each category. The asterisk indicates the orthologous groups from which potential P. yoelii genes orthologous to P. falciparum genes were identified (also highlighted in bold). The analysis enabled us to identify 530 P. falciparum genes which had clear P. berghei and/or P.chabaudi orthologs, but no P. yoelii orthologs based on the reciprocal best BLAST hit analysis (Fig. 2). This analysis provided strong evidence that those orthologous genes were absent from or incorrectly annotated in the current P. yoelii genome annotation, based on the assumption that the three rodent malaria parasite species are so closely related that genes are more conserved among the three than between any of the three and the P. falciparum genome. The list of candidate P. falciparum genes is provided in Supplementary Table 2. For each of the 530 candidate P. falciparum genes identified above, we attempted to manually annotate the orthologous gene in P. yoelii based on available genome sequences. First we searched candidate P. yoelii contigs by blasting the P. falciparum gene and its orthologs in other rodent species against the P. yoelii genomic sequences. Related EST sequences were also identified. The alignments were examined manually. For genes with multiple exons, we considered only those introns with the conserved eukaryotic intron splice site GT-AG (Lu et al., 2007). Publicly available software, databases and customized scripts were used to facilitate the manual annotation (Brejova et al., 2005; Rice et al., 2000; Slater and Birney, 2005). An internal MySQL database and the associated web interface were constructed to manage the data flow. In total, we were able to manually annotate 510 orthologous P. yoelii genes from the 530 candidate P. falciparum genes (Table 5). About 90% (452/510) of these newly annotated genes had EST support, which is much higher than that of the existing annotated genes (Table 2). Interestingly, this new set of genes did not show the trend that larger genes tended to be better supported by EST evidence, as was seen in the existing annotated genes (Table 2). This implies that our manual curation is more accurate than the in silico prediction. About 21% (109/510) of the newly annotated genes spanned two or more contigs. The submission of newly annotated genes to public databases is in process. The current detailed annotations are provided in Supplementary Table 3. Summary characteristics of re-annotated orthologous P. yoelii genes We have verified the expression of seven of these re-annotated genes by PCR (Table 6 and Fig. 3). PCR amplification of cDNA prepared from mixed blood stages of P. yoelii confirms the presence of introns since the amplified products are smaller than the corresponding amplified DNA from genomic DNA. In six of the eight amplifications where introns are predicted, multiple bands in the resulting amplified cDNA were observed suggestive of alternative splicing. The gene for PY_PFB0505c, encoding beta-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase III, is predicted to be spanned by two separate contigs (Genbank ID 23485908 and 83285534) that encode the amino and carboxyl sequences of the protein. Although sequence information for the central portion of the gene is missing, using a forward primer from contig 23485908 and a reverse primer from contig 83285534, a ∼1.5 kb fragment is amplified from genomic DNA while multiple bands are observed from cDNA confirming that these two contigs are contiguous (1.PY_PFB0505c in Table 6 and Fig. 3).
Table 6.

PCR verification of newly annotated genes

Py Gene IDForward primerReverse primerGenomNo. of introncDNA
PY_PFL0415wCACAATCGTTATGCGAAAATGTCCCATGCTCTATTATCTTTGG3560356
PY_PF14_0205AAAAACCTTCATTTTATTTTATCTCCATTTTTGAGAGTGACTTTGAATGC6511317a
PY_PF14_0623GCGAACTTAACGGGATCTCAGCACACCGATCCTTTCTCTT13884756
PY_PF14_0612CGGCGGGCTTATATTAAAAAAGCAGCTCGTAATGCATCCT8093310a
PY_PFD0775cCCCCCAAAGATTTGTCTGAATGCTCCTAAAACATTTCCCATA177541415a
PY_PFB0885wTGGGTAAGTTTAAAGCGATTTTTACTTTTGAGTTAGGCCCTTTTT5161175a
1.PY_PFB0505cbTGGTCATTCTTATCCTTCACATGAAACATTCCAGCCCCAAAACC∼1500∼5∼900a
2.PY_PFB0505cbGATAATTTAGATGCCCCAAACCAAACATTCCAGCCCCAAAACC6452350
3.PY_PFB0505cbAAACACATCAGCAGCTTCAATACCACATTCCAGCCCCAAAACC252192a

aMultiple PCR products observed from cDNA suggesting alternative splicing.

bThree different forward primers were used to verify the intron positions and confirm that the gene spanned two contigs (see text).

Genom, expected size in base pair from genomic DNA; cDNA, expected size in base pair from cDNA.

Fig. 3.

PCR products confirming the expression of newly annotated genes. Oligonucleotide primers flanking selected predicted genes were amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA, G) and reverse-transcribed mRNA of mixed asexual stages (cDNA, C).

PCR products confirming the expression of newly annotated genes. Oligonucleotide primers flanking selected predicted genes were amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA, G) and reverse-transcribed mRNA of mixed asexual stages (cDNA, C). PCR verification of newly annotated genes aMultiple PCR products observed from cDNA suggesting alternative splicing. bThree different forward primers were used to verify the intron positions and confirm that the gene spanned two contigs (see text). Genom, expected size in base pair from genomic DNA; cDNA, expected size in base pair from cDNA.

4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The accumulation of publicly available Plasmodium genomic and cDNA sequences enabled us to carefully examine the existing P. yoelii genomic annotations using comparative analysis. Our analysis confirmed that the incompleteness of the P. yoelii genome data has a considerable effect on the accuracy of the gene annotation (Salzberg, 2007). There were 5812 gaps left in the P. yoelii genome sequences when the sequencing project was finished (Carlton et al., 2002). Subsequent annotation was limited to ∼87% (20 of 23 Mb) of the genome. Therefore, many genes ‘run-off’ at the end of contigs. About 21% of the genes that we re-annotated were split across two or more contigs. Many partial genes, i.e. those genes without either an annotated start or stop codon, were predicted from these short fragments of DNA. Partial genes were less likely to be supported by EST sequences as shown in Table 2, and we feel that these predictions are less accurate than those for complete genes. Additional sequencing to close these gaps will greatly facilitate the improvement of the current annotation. In addition, it was recently estimated that ∼24% of the P. falciparum genes in the current database have been incorrectly predicted (Lu et al., 2007). Since the P. yoelii genes were predicted using similar bioinformatics software, we expect that improved gene finders may be able to generate more accurate gene models. For example, our limited experience with a gene finder known as ExonHunter (Brejova et al., 2005) indicates that similar methodologies using additional sources of information, especially Plasmodium EST sequences and other Plasmodium genome annotations, will greatly improve the prediction accuracy on the available sequences. Liver stages of the parasite life cycle are considered ideal targets for malaria vaccine and drug development. Our analysis indicates that the genes expressed in liver stages are under-represented in the current P. yoelii genome annotation compared to blood stages. This bias could further compromise the study of liver stages (Blair and Carucci, 2005). The likely reason for the bias is that many blood stage ESTs were generated before the P. yoelii genome was annotated and were subsequently incorporated into the genome annotation. However, liver stage EST sequences only became available after the annotation of the P. yoelii genome was completed. It is unlikely that genes expressed in liver stages are dramatically different to those expressed in other stages, thus a separate training dataset for gene finders will not be necessary to detect these genes in the genome. The availability of the liver stage ESTs, however, assist gene identification and the selection of correct gene models from alternative predictions. Since there are no P. falciparum liver stage EST sequences, it is likely that the P. falciparum genome annotation is also lacking in liver stage proteins. Therefore, annotating genes expressed in liver stages will benefit greatly from liver stage proteome and EST data from rodent malaria models. Based on the proteomic analysis, we estimated the percentage of protein sequences that are not covered by current annotation to be 12∼15%. Since the database from six-frame translations was more comprehensive compared to the one with annotated P. berghei protein sequences and used the sequences from the same species, we consider that the 15% is more realistic. Like the ESTs, the liver stage peptides presented here will provide a great resource for the future improvement of P. yoelii annotation and the identification of proteins expressed in the liver stages. We have provided here a systematic assessment of the accuracy of the P. yoelii genome annotation based on a detailed analysis of a comprehensive Plasmodium EST sequence database. The impact of the sub-optimal genome annotation on genome-wide experiments was evaluated using locally generated proteomics data. We identified a subset of P. yoelii genes that have clear orthologs in the P. falciparum genome but are absent from, or incorrectly annotated in current databases. These genes were manually annotated. This set of newly annotated genes will greatly facilitate the use of P. yoelii as a model system for studying human malaria parasite P. falciparum.
  28 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0.

Authors:  Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Henrik Nielsen; Gunnar von Heijne; Søren Brunak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Transcriptional analysis of in vivo Plasmodium yoelii liver stage gene expression.

Authors:  John B Sacci; Jose M C Ribeiro; Fengying Huang; Uzma Alam; Joshua A Russell; Peter L Blair; Adam Witney; Daniel J Carucci; Abdu F Azad; Joao C Aguiar
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

Authors:  Robert W Snow; Carlos A Guerra; Abdisalan M Noor; Hla Y Myint; Simon I Hay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the model rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii yoelii.

Authors:  Jane M Carlton; Samuel V Angiuoli; Bernard B Suh; Taco W Kooij; Mihaela Pertea; Joana C Silva; Maria D Ermolaeva; Jonathan E Allen; Jeremy D Selengut; Hean L Koo; Jeremy D Peterson; Mihai Pop; Daniel S Kosack; Martin F Shumway; Shelby L Bidwell; Shamira J Shallom; Susan E van Aken; Steven B Riedmuller; Tamara V Feldblyum; Jennifer K Cho; John Quackenbush; Martha Sedegah; Azadeh Shoaibi; Leda M Cummings; Laurence Florens; John R Yates; J Dale Raine; Robert E Sinden; Michael A Harris; Deirdre A Cunningham; Peter R Preiser; Lawrence W Bergman; Akhil B Vaidya; Leo H van Lin; Chris J Janse; Andrew P Waters; Hamilton O Smith; Owen R White; Steven L Salzberg; J Craig Venter; Claire M Fraser; Stephen L Hoffman; Malcolm J Gardner; Daniel J Carucci
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Differential transcriptome profiling identifies Plasmodium genes encoding pre-erythrocytic stage-specific proteins.

Authors:  Karine Kaiser; Kai Matuschewski; Nelly Camargo; Jessica Ross; Stefan H I Kappe
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  A Plasmodium whole-genome synteny map: indels and synteny breakpoints as foci for species-specific genes.

Authors:  Taco W A Kooij; Jane M Carlton; Shelby L Bidwell; Neil Hall; Jai Ramesar; Chris J Janse; Andrew P Waters
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison.

Authors:  Guy St C Slater; Ewan Birney
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  cDNA sequences reveal considerable gene prediction inaccuracy in the Plasmodium falciparum genome.

Authors:  Fangli Lu; Hongying Jiang; Jinhui Ding; Jianbing Mu; Jesus G Valenzuela; José M C Ribeiro; Xin-zhuan Su
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Genetic mapping of determinants in drug resistance, virulence, disease susceptibility, and interaction of host-rodent malaria parasites.

Authors:  Xin-Zhuan Su; Jian Wu; Fangzheng Xu; Sittiporn Pattaradilokrat
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.106

Review 2.  The origins, isolation, and biological characterization of rodent malaria parasites.

Authors:  Sittiporn Pattaradilokrat; Jian Wu; Fangzheng Xu; Xin-Zhuan Su
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.106

3.  Total and putative surface proteomics of malaria parasite salivary gland sporozoites.

Authors:  Scott E Lindner; Kristian E Swearingen; Anke Harupa; Ashley M Vaughan; Photini Sinnis; Robert L Moritz; Stefan H I Kappe
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Defining species specific genome differences in malaria parasites.

Authors:  Kingsley J L Liew; Guangan Hu; Zbynek Bozdech; Preiser R Peter
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Perturbations of Plasmodium Puf2 expression and RNA-seq of Puf2-deficient sporozoites reveal a critical role in maintaining RNA homeostasis and parasite transmissibility.

Authors:  Scott E Lindner; Sebastian A Mikolajczak; Ashley M Vaughan; Wonjong Moon; Brad R Joyce; William J Sullivan; Stefan H I Kappe
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 6.  Pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccines: identifying the targets.

Authors:  Patrick E Duffy; Tejram Sahu; Adovi Akue; Neta Milman; Charles Anderson
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.217

7.  Identification of two new protective pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine antigen candidates.

Authors:  Keith Limbach; Joao Aguiar; Kalpana Gowda; Noelle Patterson; Esteban Abot; Martha Sedegah; John Sacci; Thomas Richie
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Genome sequence, transcriptome, and annotation of rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis N67.

Authors:  Cui Zhang; Cihan Oguz; Sue Huse; Lu Xia; Jian Wu; Yu-Chih Peng; Margaret Smith; Jack Chen; Carole A Long; Justin Lack; Xin-Zhuan Su
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Deep proteogenomics; high throughput gene validation by multidimensional liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry of proteins from the fungal wheat pathogen Stagonospora nodorum.

Authors:  Scott Bringans; James K Hane; Tammy Casey; Kar-Chun Tan; Richard Lipscombe; Peter S Solomon; Richard P Oliver
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Linear plasmid vector for cloning of repetitive or unstable sequences in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ronald Godiska; David Mead; Vinay Dhodda; Chengcang Wu; Rebecca Hochstein; Attila Karsi; Karen Usdin; Ali Entezam; Nikolai Ravin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.