Literature DB >> 18586486

Prognostic significance of subclassification of pT2 gastric cancer: a retrospective study of 847 patients.

Yang Lu1, Caigang Liu, Ruishan Zhang, Hua Li, Ping Lu, Feng Jin, Huimian Xu, Shubao Wang, Junqing Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic significance of subclassification of pT2 gastric cancers according to the nodal status.
METHODS: Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic outcomes of 847 gastric cancer patients who received a gastrectomy between 1985 and 2003 were retrospectively evaluated based on the subclassification of pT2 stage (i.e. pT2a and pT2b).
RESULTS: Of the patients, 244 and 603 had pT2a and pT2b stage cancers, respectively. Patients with pT2a cancers had a significantly longer disease-specific 5-year survival rate than those with pT2b cancers (P<0.001). The prognosis was significantly better in patients with pT2a cancers than in patients with pT2b cancers at pN0, pN1 and pN2 (P=0.036, 0.021, and 0.019 respectively), but not pN3 stages (P=0.775). Multivariate analysis identified age, tumor location, pT stages, pN stages, and adjuvant chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors for pT2 gastric cancers. The survival rates were similar between pT2aN1 (stage II) and pT2bN0 (stage IB) cancers (P=0.604), and between pT2aN2 (stage IIIA) and pT2bN1 (stage II) cancers (P=0.936).
CONCLUSIONS: Subclassification of pT2 gastric cancers into pT2a or pT2b is of prominent prognostic significance, and thus it is recommended that the current stage grouping conventions include subclassification of pT2, in order to more accurately predict the prognosis of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18586486     DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0960-7404            Impact factor:   3.279


  7 in total

1.  Is subdivision of pT2 tumors superior to lymph node metastasis for predicting survival of patients with gastric cancer? Review of 224 patients from four centers.

Authors:  Ahmet Bilici; Faysal Dane; Mesut Seker; Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu; Mehmet Aliustaoglu; Suleyman Temiz; Cem Gezen; Dilek Yavuzer; Gorkem Aksu; Alpaslan Mayadagli; Mahmut Gumus; Kazim Uygun; Nazim Serdar Turhal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Validation of the updated 7th edition AJCC TNM staging criteria for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lee J McGhan; Barbara A Pockaj; Richard J Gray; Sanjay P Bagaria; Nabil Wasif
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Sixth and seventh tumor-node-metastasis staging system compared in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Tommaso Zurleni; Elson Gjoni; Andrea Ballabio; Roberto Casieri; Paola Ceriani; Luca Marzoli; Francesco Zurleni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-27

4.  The difference in clinic-pathological features between signet ring cell carcinoma and gastric mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hao Jiang; Hongfeng Zhang; Lantian Tian; Xi Zhang; Yingwei Xue
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-05-01

5.  Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open subtotal gastrectomy for pT2 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hyun-Tae Chun; Ki-Han Kim; Min-Chan Kim; Ghap-Joong Jung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer.

Authors:  Luigina Graziosi; Elisabetta Marino; Emanuel Cavazzoni; Annibale Donini
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Comparison between superficial muscularis propria and deep muscularis propria infiltration in gastric cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wei-Han Zhang; Du He; Dan-Ni Chen; Ting-Ting Li; Xin-Zu Chen; Kun Yang; Kai Liu; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou; Jian Kun Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.