Literature DB >> 18586311

Cervical cancer vaccination indications, efficacy, and side effects.

José-María Bayas1, Laura Costas, Amparo Muñoz.   

Abstract

Due to the limited contact of the human papillomavirus (HPV) with the immune system, past infection does not guarantee lasting protection. Two preventive vaccines (Gardasil and Cervarix) that can impede persistent HPV infection and its consequences are now available. They use structural L1 capsular proteins obtained by genetic recombination and antigens for genotypes 16 and 18, which are responsible for around 70% of cases of uterine cancer worldwide. Evaluation of their protective efficacy is based on the capacity of the vaccine to prevent persistent infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Phase I and II trials showed the safety of these vaccines and their capacity to produce very-high titers of antibodies (low or non-existent after natural infection). Phase II and III trials have confirmed these aspects and shown an efficacy of nearly 100% in the protocol analysis in preventing infection and the CIN associated with oncogenic vaccine genotypes. Some trials have also shown cross-protection against infections produced by other genotypes (such as 45 and 31). The optimal vaccination strategy is vaccination of girls aged 8-14 years. Other strategies should include the catch-up of adolescent and women not yet sexually-active, as well as the vaccination of sexually-active women. The progressive development of primary prevention strategies should coexist with secondary prevention with redesigned screening programs. The successful development of vaccination programs will require the support of public health authorities, the coordination of health workers from different areas and increased public awareness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18586311     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

Review 1.  Worldwide impact of the human papillomavirus vaccine.

Authors:  Amy A Hakim; Tri A Dinh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-04-23

2.  Management strategies and cost effectiveness in the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Smita R Prasad
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2009-06-05

3.  Combining agent based-models and virtual screening techniques to predict the best citrus-derived vaccine adjuvants against human papilloma virus.

Authors:  Marzio Pennisi; Giulia Russo; Silvia Ravalli; Francesco Pappalardo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  [A Text Mining Analysis of HPV Vaccination Research Trends].

Authors:  Yedong Son; Hee Sun Kang
Journal:  Child Health Nurs Res       Date:  2019-10-31

5.  Persistence of immune responses to the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in women aged 15-55 years and first-time modelling of antibody responses in mature women: results from an open-label 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  T Schwarz; M Spaczynski; A Kaufmann; J Wysocki; A Gałaj; K Schulze; P Suryakiran; F Thomas; D Descamps
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  A Content Analysis of Arabic and English Newspapers before, during, and after the Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Campaign in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Iffat Elbarazi; Hina Raheel; Kim Cummings; Tom Loney
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-08-29

Review 7.  Studying cancer immunotherapy using patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) in humanized mice.

Authors:  Yunsik Choi; Sanghyuk Lee; Kapyoul Kim; Soo-Hyun Kim; Yeun-Jun Chung; Charles Lee
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 8.718

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.