Literature DB >> 18585835

Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in membranous nephropathy: a 1-year randomized controlled trial.

Bertrand Dussol1, Sophie Morange, Stéphane Burtey, Monica Indreies, Elisabeth Cassuto, Georges Mourad, Emmanuel Villar, Claire Pouteil-Noble, Huseyin Karaaslan, Hélène Sichez, Catherine Lasseur, Yashou Delmas, Marie-Béatrice Nogier, Mohamed Fathallah, Anderson Loundou, Valérie Mayor, Yvon Berland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) is controversial because of the lack of clear benefit of the immunosuppressive regimens on patient or renal survival. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for patients with MGN. STUDY
DESIGN: 1-year prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 36 patients with biopsy-proven idiopathic MGN and nephrotic syndrome. INTERVENTION: 19 patients received MMF (2 g/d) for 12 months and 17 patients were in the control group. All patients had the same conservative treatment based on renin-angiotensin blockers, statins, low-salt and low-protein diet, and diuretics in case of edema. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: End points were the mean proteinuria over creatinuria ratio in mg/g throughout the study and numbers of complete and partial remissions at 1 year (month 12). Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat analysis.
RESULTS: Mean proteinuria over creatinuria ratio was stable in both groups throughout the study (P = 0.1). Mean proteinuria over creatinuria ratio was 4,690 +/- 2,212 mg/g in the MMF group and 6,548 +/- 4,601 mg/g in the control group (95% confidence interval of the difference, -619 to +4,247; P = 0.1). Remission was complete in 3 patients (1 in the MMF group, 2 in the control group; P = 0.5) and partial in 11 patients (6 in the MMF group, 5 in the control group; P = 0.9). The probability of complete or partial remission did not differ between the 2 groups after 12 months (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.48 to 1.75; P = 0.7). Kidney function was stable in the 2 groups according to estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine level. LIMITATIONS: The small number of patients and short follow-up prevent generalizations.
CONCLUSIONS: A 12-month regimen of MMF did not decrease mean proteinuria over creatinuria ratio or increase partial and complete remissions. Serious adverse effects were observed in 4 patients (20%) receiving MMF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18585835     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  27 in total

1.  Balancing cancer risk and efficacy of using cyclophosphamide to treat idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Sana Khan; W Kline Bolton
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Treatment of primary membranous nephropathy: where are we now?

Authors:  Andrea Angioi; Nicola Lepori; Ana Coloma López; Sanjeev Sethi; Fernando C Fervenza; Antonello Pani
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 3.  Management of Membranous Nephropathy in Western Countries.

Authors:  Talal Alfaadhel; Daniel Cattran
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-09

Review 4.  Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Julia M Hofstra; Fernando C Fervenza; Jack F M Wetzels
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  Primary Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  William G Couser
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Immunosuppression for membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.

Authors:  Yizhi Chen; Arrigo Schieppati; Guangyan Cai; Xiangmei Chen; Javier Zamora; Giovanni A Giuliano; Norbert Braun; Annalisa Perna
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 7.  Glomerular diseases: membranous nephropathy--a modern view.

Authors:  Claudio Ponticelli; Richard J Glassock
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Controversies in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Meryl Waldman; Howard A Austin
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 9.  Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: management strategies.

Authors:  Marco Quaglia; Piero Stratta
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Meryl Waldman; Howard A Austin
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.