Literature DB >> 18585684

Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.

Milena Rabovsky1, Carlos J Alvarez, Annette Hohlfeld, Werner Sommer.   

Abstract

In order to test the frequent assumption that lexical access in visual word recognition would proceed independent of central attention, the overlapping task paradigm has recently been employed with somewhat contradictory results. Here we combined overlapping tasks with the recording of event-related brain potentials to assess task load dependent modulations of lexical access in more detail. The study was carried out in Spanish with native Spanish speaking participants. They performed a high-priority pitch discrimination task followed by a visual lexical decision task, in which the difficulty of lexical access was manipulated by means of word frequency. Increasing task load by reducing the stimulus onset asynchrony between both tasks from 700 to 100 ms resulted in considerable slowing of lexical decisions. Word frequency effects were underadditive with the slowing induced by task overlap, indicating lexical access to take place although central attention was dedicated to the high-priority task. The effect of word frequency on the event-related potentials, used as electrophysiological indicator of lexical access, was much less delayed than the lexical decision responses in conditions of high task overlap, providing converging evidence for the independence of lexical access from central attention. On the other hand, this slight delay and an amplitude reduction of the effect with high task load show that lexical access may not be completely autonomous, but subject to some additional early source of interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18585684     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  6 in total

1.  ERP characterization of sustained attention effects in visual lexical categorization.

Authors:  Clara D Martin; Guillaume Thierry; Jean-François Démonet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Lexical diversity for adults with and without aphasia across discourse elicitation tasks.

Authors:  Gerasimos Fergadiotis; Heather Harris Wright
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.

Authors:  Ryan J Hubbard; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.610

4.  Is Semantic Processing During Sentence Reading Autonomous or Controlled? Evidence from the N400 Component in a Dual Task Paradigm.

Authors:  Annette Hohlfeld; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-06-30

5.  Spatial attention in written word perception.

Authors:  Veronica Montani; Andrea Facoetti; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Attentional modulation of orthographic neighborhood effects during reading: Evidence from event-related brain potentials in a psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Milena Rabovsky; Markus Conrad; Carlos J Álvarez; Jörg Paschke-Goldt; Werner Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.