Literature DB >> 18584258

Mechanisms of pheromone communication disruption in Choristoneura rosaceana exposed to microencapsulated (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate formulated with and without horticultural oil.

Andreas H Wins-Purdy1, Gary J R Judd, Maya L Evenden.   

Abstract

Flight tunnel and electrophysiological assays with male Choristoneura rosaceana Harris (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) were conducted to investigate the non-competitive mechanisms of communication disruption caused by microencapsulated (MEC) (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (3M MEC-LR) formulated with and without horticultural oil (Purespray Green). Male C. rosaceana were exposed for 1 h by resting on metal surfaces sprayed with either water, 2% oil in water, MEC-LR in water, or MEC-LR + 2% oil in water. In one experiment, sprayed surfaces were allowed to age up to 47 days in a laboratory fume hood prior to moth exposure to examine the effect of ageing on the disruptive efficacy of the formulations. In flight tunnel assays with calling females, males exposed to MEC or MEC + oil treatments for 1 h were significantly disrupted up to 1 h after exposure, and both treatments were effective for 47 days. Electroantennograms revealed no reduction in antennal sensitivity when measured 75 s after a 1-h exposure. Collectively, these results support habituation as a key mechanism of communication disruption for C. rosaceana exposed to the MEC formulations tested here. Male proximity to the pheromone-treated surfaces appears to be important in maintaining a disruptive effect as MEC treatments age and pheromone release rates decline. The addition of 2% oil increased the number of microcapsules deposited on sprayed surfaces and caused a moderate but significant increase in the disruptive effect of the MEC formulation. A better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie disruption by MEC formulations, and how an adjuvant like horticultural oil may enhance these mechanisms, may lead to improvements in this technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18584258     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-008-9500-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  15 in total

1.  Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part 2): Case studies.

Authors:  J R Miller; L J Gut; F M de Lame; L L Stelinski
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Absorption and release of pheromone ofEpiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by apple leaves.

Authors:  G Karg; D M Suckling; S J Bradley
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Increased EAG responses of tortricid moths after prolonged exposure to plant volatiles: evidence for octopamine-mediated sensitization.

Authors:  Lukasz L Stelinski; James R Miller; Noah E Ressa; Larry J Gut
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  Large field trial with microencapsulated sex pheromone to prevent mating of the gypsy moth.

Authors:  M Beroza; C S Hood; D Trefrey; D E Leonard; E F Knipling; W Klassen; L J Stevens
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Disruption of pheromone communication of Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using microencapsulated sex pheromones formulated with horticultural oil.

Authors:  A H Wins-Purdy; G J R Judd; M L Evenden
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.377

6.  Modification of responses byCampylomma verbasci (Heteroptera: Miridae) to pheromone blends in atmospheres permeated with synthetic sex pheromone or individual components.

Authors:  G J Judd; H L McBrien; J H Borden
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Comparison of a sprayable pheromone formulation and two hand-applied pheromone dispensers foruse in the integrated control of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).

Authors:  R M Trimble; D J Pree; E S Barszcz; N J Carter
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Disruption of male oriental fruit moth to calling females in a wind tunnel by different concentrations of synthetic pheromone.

Authors:  C J Sanders; G S Lucuik
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Changes in pheromone titer of oblique-banded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana, virgin females as a function of time of day, age, and temperature.

Authors:  J Delisle; L Royer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Pheromone-mediated responses of male cabbage looper moths,Trichoplusia ni, following various exposures to sex pheromone or (Z)-7-dodecenol.

Authors:  Y B Liu; K F Haynes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  3 in total

1.  Persistence of the Gypsy Moth Pheromone, Disparlure, in the Environment in Various Climates.

Authors:  Ksenia S Onufrieva; Kevin W Thorpe; Andrea D Hickman; Donna S Leonard; E Anderson Roberts; Patrick C Tobin
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Preparation, characterisation, and controlled release of sex pheromone-loaded MPEG-PCL diblock copolymer micelles for Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Yixin Chen; Xiuqin Chen; Yong Chen; Hui Wei; Shuo Lin; Houjun Tian; Tao Lin; Jianwei Zhao; Xiaojun Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pheromone Deployment Strategies for Mating Disruption of a Vineyard Mealybug.

Authors:  Kent M Daane; Monica L Cooper; Nathan H Mercer; Brian N Hogg; Glenn Y Yokota; David R Haviland; Stephen C Welter; Frances E Cave; Ashfaq A Sial; Elizabeth A Boyd
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.381

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.