Literature DB >> 18583403

Pain relief following vertebroplasty in patients with and without localizing tenderness on palpation.

A Ehteshami Rad1, D F Kallmes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Focal point tenderness over the fractured level is believed to be a necessary criterion for performing vertebroplasty. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the presence of focal-point tenderness over a fracture treated with vertebroplasty predicts superior clinical outcome as compared with outcomes in patients without such tenderness.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we divided patients into 3 groups on the basis of pain patterns noted during history and physical examination before an initial vertebroplasty in 534 consecutive patients. Group 1 comprised 373 (70%) of 534 patients with focal-point tenderness over the treated fractures. Group 2 comprised 119 (22%) patients with focal-point tenderness over the treated fractures as well as subjective off-midline pain or focal tenderness to palpation over nontreated vertebrae. Group 3 comprised 42 (8%) patients without focal-point tenderness over the treated fractures but with subjective off-midline pain or tenderness to palpation over nontreated vertebrae. Outcomes included pain at rest and with activity as well as the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score. Statistical tools included the 2-tailed t test with a Bonferroni adjustment.
RESULTS: Baseline pain at rest and with activity was not different among groups, but the proportion of group 3 patients maintained on a narcotic anesthesia preprocedure was less than that of groups 1 and 2 (P = .02 compared with both groups). Group 3 achieved significantly lower pain scores at rest at 1 month (P < .0001 compared with group 1 and P < .001 compared with group 2).
CONCLUSION: The presence of focal-point tenderness does not predict superior clinical response following vertebroplasty compared with the absence of focal tenderness. Even patients without focal tenderness may benefit from vertebroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18583403      PMCID: PMC8118766          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  31 in total

1.  New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner.

Authors:  A T Trout; D F Kallmes; T J Kaufmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Percutaneous transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty for the treatment of spinal compression fractures.

Authors:  A P Amar; D W Larsen; N Esnaashari; F C Albuquerque; S D Lavine; G P Teitelbaum
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty immediately relieves pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and prevents prolonged immobilization of patients.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Kobayashi; Keiji Shimoyama; Keiya Nakamura; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Response of nonmidline pain to percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Jill E Gibson; Thomas K Pilgram; Louis A Gilula
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Lack of preoperative spinous process tenderness does not affect clinical success of percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  John R Gaughen; Mary E Jensen; Patricia A Schweickert; Timothy J Kaufmann; William F Marx; David F Kallmes
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 6.  Vertebroplasty: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Mubin I Syed; Azim Shaikh
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Outcomes of patients receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy who undergo percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  C A Koch; K F Layton; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization.

Authors:  J D Barr; M S Barr; T J Lemley; R M McCann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: relationship between vertebral body bone marrow edema pattern on MR images and initial clinical response.

Authors:  Noboru Tanigawa; Atsushi Komemushi; Shuji Kariya; Hiroyuki Kojima; Yuzo Shomura; Koshi Ikeda; Naoto Omura; Takamichi Murakami; Satoshi Sawada
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Clinical outcomes after acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a 2-year non-randomised trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy.

Authors:  Terrence H Diamond; Carl Bryant; Lois Browne; William A Clark
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Bryan Jay; Sun Ho Ahn
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Asymptomatic and unrecognized cement pulmonary embolism commonly occurs with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  M T Luetmer; B J Bartholmai; A E Rad; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Effect of Systemic Therapies on Outcomes following Vertebroplasty among Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  R J McDonald; J S McDonald; D F Kallmes; V T Lehman; F E Diehn; J T Wald; K R Thielen; A Dispenzieri; P H Luetmer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Is severe pain immediately after spinal augmentation a predictor of long-term outcomes?

Authors:  Y W Cho; J S McDonald; A E Rad; J J Ocel; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.825

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.