Shereen S Azer1, Ronald E Kerby, Lisa A Knobloch. 1. Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus, OH 43218-2357, USA. azer.1@osu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This in vitro comparative study evaluated the effect of different stone mixing methods on material properties of four dental stones. Two ADA type IV stones (Silky-Rock and Snap-Stone), one type V high expansion stone (Die Keen), and one recently introduced type V specialty stone (HandiMix) were chosen for this study. METHODS: Forty cylindrical specimens (25 mm x 12.5 mm) were cast for each of the nine stone sub-groups and bench dried at 23+/-2 degrees C for 1 and 24h. Specimens were then tested in an Instron in tensile and compression modes at crosshead speeds of 0.5 and 1.0 mm/min, respectively. Four rectangular-shaped specimens (30 mm x 15 mm x 15 mm) of each stone type were cast and bench dried for 48 h. Knoop microhardness measurements were obtained from defined areas on each specimen for surface hardness testing using 200 g load and 20s dwell time. A 12.6 mm(2) area was then delimited in the center of two sides of each specimen and photographed under low power magnification (40x). The average pore number per area was then determined for each specimen for surface porosity testing. The setting time and setting expansion for each stone type was recorded as well. RESULTS: ANOVA (P<0.001) and Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsh test (P<0.05) showed significant differences between diametral tensile strengths and pore numbers for both stone types and mixing methods. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the newly introduced mixing method did not appear to have an effect on the physical properties of HandiMix stone.
OBJECTIVES: This in vitro comparative study evaluated the effect of different stone mixing methods on material properties of four dental stones. Two ADA type IV stones (Silky-Rock and Snap-Stone), one type V high expansion stone (Die Keen), and one recently introduced type V specialty stone (HandiMix) were chosen for this study. METHODS: Forty cylindrical specimens (25 mm x 12.5 mm) were cast for each of the nine stone sub-groups and bench dried at 23+/-2 degrees C for 1 and 24h. Specimens were then tested in an Instron in tensile and compression modes at crosshead speeds of 0.5 and 1.0 mm/min, respectively. Four rectangular-shaped specimens (30 mm x 15 mm x 15 mm) of each stone type were cast and bench dried for 48 h. Knoop microhardness measurements were obtained from defined areas on each specimen for surface hardness testing using 200 g load and 20s dwell time. A 12.6 mm(2) area was then delimited in the center of two sides of each specimen and photographed under low power magnification (40x). The average pore number per area was then determined for each specimen for surface porosity testing. The setting time and setting expansion for each stone type was recorded as well. RESULTS: ANOVA (P<0.001) and Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsh test (P<0.05) showed significant differences between diametral tensile strengths and pore numbers for both stone types and mixing methods. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the newly introduced mixing method did not appear to have an effect on the physical properties of HandiMix stone.
Authors: Ciro T Niekawa; Simone Kreve; Gisseli Bertozzi A'vila; Gilmar Gil Godoy; J R Eduardo Vieira da Silva; Sergio Candido Dias Journal: J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Date: 2017-02-21
Authors: Mohammad Ayed Al Qahtani; Mohammed Alrefaie; Abdulaziz Altamimi; Ibrahim Aljowyed; Majed Ayed Al Qahtani; Abdulaziz AlQahtani; Syed Rashid Habib Journal: Saudi Dent J Date: 2019-04-11