Literature DB >> 18583008

Guidelines for the derivation of Biomonitoring Equivalents: report from the Biomonitoring Equivalents Expert Workshop.

Sean M Hays1, Lesa L Aylward, Judy S LaKind, Michael J Bartels, Hugh A Barton, Peter J Boogaard, Conrad Brunk, Stephen DiZio, Michael Dourson, Daniel A Goldstein, John Lipscomb, Michael E Kilpatrick, Daniel Krewski, Kannan Krishnan, Monica Nordberg, Miles Okino, Yu-Mei Tan, Claude Viau, Janice W Yager.   

Abstract

Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs) are defined as the concentration of a chemical (or metabolite) in a biological medium (blood, urine, human milk, etc.) consistent with defined exposure guidance values or toxicity criteria including reference doses and reference concentrations (RfD and RfCs), minimal risk levels (MRLs), or tolerable daily intakes (TDIs) [Hays, S.M., Becker, R.A., Leung, H.W., Aylward, L.L., Pyatt, D.W., 2007. Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 47(1), 96-109]. The utility of the BE is to provide a screening tool for placing biomonitoring data into a health risk context. A Panel of experts took part in the Biomonitoring Equivalents Expert Workshop to discuss the various technical issues associated with calculating BEs and developed a set of guidelines for use in the derivation of BEs. Issues addressed included the role of the point of departure (POD) in BE derivation, the appropriate application of human and animal kinetic data and models, consideration of default uncertainty factor components in the context of internal dose-based extrapolations, and relevance of mode of action to technical choices in kinetic modeling and identification of screening values. The findings from this Expert Panel Workshop on BE derivation are presented and provide a set of guidelines and considerations for use in BE derivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18583008     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  16 in total

1.  Worrying exposure to trace elements in the population of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Authors:  J Tuakuila; D Lison; A-C Lantin; F Mbuyi; G Deumer; V Haufroid; P Hoet
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Cumulative Risk Assessment (CRA): transforming the way we assess health risks.

Authors:  Pamela R D Williams; G Scott Dotson; Andrew Maier
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Incorporating regulatory guideline values in analysis of epidemiology data.

Authors:  Chris Gennings; Huan Shu; Christina Rudén; Mattias Öberg; Christian Lindh; Hannu Kiviranta; Carl-Gustaf Bornehag
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU): Human Biomonitoring Guidance Values Derived for Dimethylformamide.

Authors:  Farida Lamkarkach; Matthieu Meslin; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Petra Apel; Robert Garnier
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 5.  Biomonitoring data for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in the United States and Canada: interpretation in a public health risk assessment context using Biomonitoring Equivalents.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Marsha K Morgan; Tye E Arbuckle; Dana B Barr; Carol J Burns; Bruce H Alexander; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Determinants of phthalate exposure among a U.S.-based group of Latino workers.

Authors:  Janice A Allotey; Meleah Boyle; Amir Sapkota; Linyan Zhu; Roger D Peng; Mary A Garza; Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.840

7.  Evaluation of biomonitoring data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Christopher R Kirman; Rita Schoeny; Christopher J Portier; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Relevance of drinking water as a source of human exposure to bisphenol A.

Authors:  Scott M Arnold; Kathryn E Clark; Charles A Staples; Gary M Klecka; Steve S Dimond; Norbert Caspers; Steven G Hentges
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in chemical risk assessment.

Authors:  Moiz Mumtaz; Jeffrey Fisher; Benjamin Blount; Patricia Ruiz
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-03-19

10.  Development of screening tools for the interpretation of chemical biomonitoring data.

Authors:  Richard A Becker; Sean M Hays; Steven Robison; Lesa L Aylward
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.