BACKGROUND: We compared the clinical effectiveness of oseltamivir and zanamivir in children with influenza A (H1N1) virus, influenza A (H3N2) virus, and influenza B virus infections. METHODS: Total febrile period and the duration of fever after the start of treatment were compared between an oseltamivir-treated group (mean age, 8.9 years; range, 4.0-15.9 years) and a zanamivir-treated group (mean age, 10.0 years; range, 4.0-15.7 years) in the pediatric outpatient clinics of our hospitals. Oseltamivir was used to treat 91 children with influenza A (H3N2) infection and 24 children with influenza A (H1N1) infection. Zanamivir was used to treat 35 children with influenza A (H3N2) infection and 12 children with influenza A (H1N1) infection. Oseltamivir was also used to treat 128 children with influenza B virus infection, and zanamivir was used to treat 59 with influenza B virus infection. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in total febrile period or duration of fever after the start of treatment between the oseltamivir-treated group and the zanamivir-treated group of children with influenza A (H3N2) infection (mean duration of febrile period, 2.40 days vs. 2.39 days; mean duration of fever after the start of treatment, 1.35 days vs. 1.40 days), influenza A (H1N1) (mean duration of febrile period, 2.60 days vs. 2.46 days; mean duration of fever after the start of treatment, 1.79 days vs, 1.54 days), or influenza B (mean duration of febrile period, 2.95 days vs. 2.84 days; mean duration of fever after the start of treatment, 1.86 days vs. 1.67 days). Oseltamivir was more effective against influenza A (H3N2) than against influenza A (H1N1) or influenza B. CONCLUSIONS: Oseltamivir and zanamivir were equally effective in reducing the febrile period of children with influenza A (H1N1), influenza A (H3N2), and influenza B virus infection.
BACKGROUND: We compared the clinical effectiveness of oseltamivir and zanamivir in children with influenza A (H1N1) virus, influenza A (H3N2) virus, and influenza B virus infections. METHODS: Total febrile period and the duration of fever after the start of treatment were compared between an oseltamivir-treated group (mean age, 8.9 years; range, 4.0-15.9 years) and a zanamivir-treated group (mean age, 10.0 years; range, 4.0-15.7 years) in the pediatric outpatient clinics of our hospitals. Oseltamivir was used to treat 91 children with influenza A (H3N2) infection and 24 children with influenza A (H1N1) infection. Zanamivir was used to treat 35 children with influenza A (H3N2) infection and 12 children with influenza A (H1N1) infection. Oseltamivir was also used to treat 128 children with influenza B virus infection, and zanamivir was used to treat 59 with influenza B virus infection. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in total febrile period or duration of fever after the start of treatment between the oseltamivir-treated group and the zanamivir-treated group of children with influenza A (H3N2) infection (mean duration of febrile period, 2.40 days vs. 2.39 days; mean duration of fever after the start of treatment, 1.35 days vs. 1.40 days), influenza A (H1N1) (mean duration of febrile period, 2.60 days vs. 2.46 days; mean duration of fever after the start of treatment, 1.79 days vs, 1.54 days), or influenza B (mean duration of febrile period, 2.95 days vs. 2.84 days; mean duration of fever after the start of treatment, 1.86 days vs. 1.67 days). Oseltamivir was more effective against influenza A (H3N2) than against influenza A (H1N1) or influenza B. CONCLUSIONS:Oseltamivir and zanamivir were equally effective in reducing the febrile period of children with influenza A (H1N1), influenza A (H3N2), and influenza B virus infection.
Authors: Nancy Santesso; Jonathan Hsu; Reem Mustafa; Jan Brozek; Yao Long Chen; Jessica P Hopkins; Adrienne Cheung; Gayane Hovhannisyan; Liudmila Ivanova; Signe A Flottorp; Ingvil Saeterdal; Arthur D Wong; Jinhui Tian; Timothy M Uyeki; Elie A Akl; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Fiona Smaill; Holger J Schünemann Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Jonathan Hsu; Nancy Santesso; Reem Mustafa; Jan Brozek; Yao Long Chen; Jessica P Hopkins; Adrienne Cheung; Gayane Hovhannisyan; Liudmila Ivanova; Signe A Flottorp; Ingvil Saeterdal; Arthur D Wong; Jinhui Tian; Timothy M Uyeki; Elie A Akl; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Fiona Smaill; Holger J Schünemann Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jose L Sanchez; Michael J Cooper; Christopher A Myers; James F Cummings; Kelly G Vest; Kevin L Russell; Joyce L Sanchez; Michelle J Hiser; Charlotte A Gaydos Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Aaron J Oakley; Susan Barrett; Thomas S Peat; Janet Newman; Victor A Streltsov; Lynne Waddington; Takehiko Saito; Masato Tashiro; Jennifer L McKimm-Breschkin Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Scott A Harper; John S Bradley; Janet A Englund; Thomas M File; Stefan Gravenstein; Frederick G Hayden; Allison J McGeer; Kathleen M Neuzil; Andrew T Pavia; Michael L Tapper; Timothy M Uyeki; Richard K Zimmerman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 9.079