Literature DB >> 18582148

Evaluation of adverse events of oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy experienced by a geriatric population in a real-world setting: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Carl V Asche1, Carrie McAdam-Marx, Laura Shane-McWhorter, Xiaoming Sheng, Craig A Plauschinat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the risk of adverse events (AEs) associated with the use of metformin, sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones among geriatric patients in a usual care setting.
METHODS: An electronic medical record database was utilized to identify geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged > or =65 years from 1996 to 2005. Patients naive to oral antihyperglycemic drug (OAD) therapy were followed for 395 days post initiation of metformin, sulfonylurea or thiazolidinedione treatment. AEs related to study drugs were evaluated during the follow-up period, and the risks of developing an AE were evaluated and adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics by OAD treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 5438 patients (mean age 73.2 [SD 5.08] years, 56.1% female) were identified. During the follow-up period, 12.5% of patients experienced an AE (8.3% of metformin, 13.9% of sulfonylurea and 19.8% of thiazolidinedione recipients). Sulfonylurea (odds ratio [OR] 1.74; 95% CI 1.41, 2.13) and thiazolidinedione (OR 2.86; 95% CI 2.23, 3.65) recipients were more likely to experience an AE than metformin recipients, after adjustment for baseline demographic and co-morbidity differences. The average time to onset of a metformin AE (175 days) was less than that for sulfonylurea or thiazolidinedione treatment (192 and 201 days, respectively). The most common AEs were abdominal pain with metformin (42.3%) and weight gain >4.5 kg for sulfonylureas (63.2%) and thiazolidinediones (68.2%). Hypoglycaemia occurred in 2.6% and 2.2% of sulfonylurea and thiazolidinedione recipients, respectively. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric patients in a real-world setting experienced AEs with metformin, sulfonylurea and thiazolidinedione therapy, although rates differed from those seen in clinical trials, particularly for weight gain and hypoglycaemia. Lactic acidosis occurred at a higher rate with metformin therapy than has been reported in clinical trials, but our results were in the same range for abdominal pain and lower for diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting and dyspepsia. AEs related to sulfonylurea therapy were in the same range as in clinical trials for weight gain but lower for hypoglycaemia, dizziness and headaches. AEs related to thiazolidinedione therapy were more common in our study than in clinical trials, and within the same range for weight gain and elevated liver enzymes but lower for hypoglycaemia and oedema. While AE reporting is likely to be different in a real-world setting than in clinical trials, the observed variances may also be due to the aetiology of diabetes and the physiological response to hypoglycaemia in an older population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18582148     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200825070-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  41 in total

1.  Improving metabolic control leads to better working memory in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Christopher M Ryan; Martin I Freed; Julie A Rood; Alexander R Cobitz; Brian R Waterhouse; Mark W J Strachan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Diabetes in elderly adults.

Authors:  G S Meneilly; D Tessier
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 4.  US public health and the 21st century: diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  J McKinlay; L Marceau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Evaluation of liver function in type 2 diabetic patients during clinical trials: evidence that rosiglitazone does not cause hepatic dysfunction.

Authors:  Harold E Lebovitz; Margaret Kreider; Martin I Freed
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Efficacy, dose-response relationship and safety of once-daily extended-release metformin (Glucophage XR) in type 2 diabetic patients with inadequate glycaemic control despite prior treatment with diet and exercise: results from two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Authors:  K Fujioka; R L Brazg; I Raz; S Bruce; S Joyal; R Swanink; M Pans
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.577

7.  A placebo-controlled, randomized study of glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for whom diet therapy is unsuccessful.

Authors:  D S Schade; L Jovanovic; J Schneider
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  Efficacy of glyburide/metformin tablets compared with initial monotherapy in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Alan J Garber; Daniel S Donovan; Paresh Dandona; Simon Bruce; Jong-Soon Park
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among U.S. adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Carol E Koro; Steven J Bowlin; Nancy Bourgeois; Donald O Fedder
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Thiazolidinediones, peripheral edema, and type 2 diabetes: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Sunder Mudaliar; Anna R Chang; Robert R Henry
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.443

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparing adverse event rates of oral blood glucose-lowering drugs reported by patients and healthcare providers: a post-hoc analysis of observational studies published between 1999 and 2011.

Authors:  Liana Hakobyan; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Dick de Zeeuw; Daniela Dobre; Petra Denig
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  A review of methods used in assessing non-serious adverse drug events in observational studies among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Authors:  Liana Hakobyan; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Dick de Zeeuw; Daniela Dobre; Petra Denig
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 3.  Incidence of Immune-Related Adverse Events with Program Death Receptor-1- and Program Death Receptor-1 Ligand-Directed Therapies in Genitourinary Cancers.

Authors:  Benjamin L Maughan; Erin Bailey; David M Gill; Neeraj Agarwal
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Eleven-year multimorbidity burden among 637 255 people with and without type 2 diabetes: a population-based study using primary care and linked hospitalisation data.

Authors:  Salwa S Zghebi; Douglas T Steinke; Martin K Rutter; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Incretin-based therapies: new treatments for type 2 diabetes in the new millennium.

Authors:  Joan Khoo; Christopher K Rayner; Karen L Jones; Michael Horowitz
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.