Literature DB >> 18581818

A new approach to outliers in meta-analysis.

Rose Baker1, Dan Jackson.   

Abstract

The synthesis of evidence from trials and medical studies using meta-analysis is essential for Evidence Based Medicine. However, problematical outlying results often occur even under the random-effects model. We propose a model that allows a long-tailed distribution for the random effect, which removes the necessity for an arbitrary decision to include or exclude outliers. In this approach, they are included, but with a reduced weight. We also introduce a modification of the forest plot to show the downweighting of outliers. We illustrate the methodology and its usefulness by carrying out both frequentist and Bayesian meta-analyses using data sets from the Cochrane Collaboration.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18581818     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-007-9041-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  14 in total

1.  Meta-analysis by random effect modelling in generalized linear models.

Authors:  M Aitkin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999 Sep 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A bound for publication bias based on the fraction of unpublished studies.

Authors:  John Copas; Dan Jackson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies.

Authors:  Rose Baker; Dan Jackson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Authors:  R J Hardy; S G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Incorporating variability in estimates of heterogeneity in the random effects model in meta-analysis.

Authors:  B J Biggerstaff; R L Tweedie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

Review 7.  The statistical basis of meta-analysis.

Authors:  J L Fleiss
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study.

Authors:  T C Smith; D J Spiegelhalter; A Thomas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Single dose oral aspirin for acute pain.

Authors:  J E Edwards; A Oldman; L Smith; S L Collins; D Carroll; P J Wiffen; H J McQuay; R A Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

10.  Flexible parametric models for random-effects distributions.

Authors:  Katherine J Lee; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  18 in total

1.  Meta-analysis in medical research.

Authors:  A B Haidich
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  FMRI group analysis combining effect estimates and their variances.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Ziad S Saad; Audrey R Nath; Michael S Beauchamp; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.

Authors:  Chuan Hong; Richard D Riley; Yong Chen
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.273

4.  Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Richard Riley; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; Jayne F Tierney; Andrew J Copas; Sarah Burdett
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Multivariate meta-analysis using individual participant data.

Authors:  R D Riley; M J Price; D Jackson; M Wardle; F Gueyffier; J Wang; J A Staessen; I R White
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.273

7.  A random effects variance shift model for detecting and accommodating outliers in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Freedom N Gumedze; Dan Jackson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.

Authors:  Martin Law; Dan Jackson; Rebecca Turner; Kirsty Rhodes; Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.

Authors:  Christopher Partlett; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  New models for describing outliers in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rose Baker; Dan Jackson
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.273

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.