Literature DB >> 18581616

Specialty selection and relative job satisfaction of family physicians and medical specialists in Austria.

Wolfgang Spiegel1, Otto Pichlhöfer, Diana Haoula, Barbara Schneider, Manfred Maier.   

Abstract

AIM: To estimate the relative job satisfaction of Austrian family physicians and other specialists with respect to whether or not they obtained training in the desired specialty.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we re-examined the previous data on allocation of medical training posts in Austria. All board-certified physicians practicing in Vienna were surveyed with a 12-item questionnaire. We analyzed the association between respondents' desired and practiced medical specialty and their answer to the question of whether they thought they would have had greater job satisfaction in a different medical specialty. We also calculated their relative job satisfaction.
RESULTS: Of 8127 licensed physicians, 2736 (34%) completed the questionnaire in two mailings. Of physicians who completed the questionnaire, 50.3% (43.2% of men) did not obtain the training in their desired specialty and 65.1% stated that they had originally desired a different specialty. There was a significant difference in relative job satisfaction between specialists who got their desired medical specialty (n=1005) and those who did not (n=697) (0.95 vs 0.62 of maximum 1, P<0.001). No significant difference in relative job satisfaction was found between family physicians who had originally wanted to become specialists (n=679) and specialists who had originally wanted to become family physicians (n=533; 0.89 vs 0.81; P=0.01; chi(2) test).
CONCLUSION: A high percentage of family physicians in Austria had originally wanted to become practitioners of a different specialty. Among physicians who did not receive training in their desired medical specialty, family physicians showed a significantly higher relative job satisfaction than specialists. Obtaining the desired medical specialty is a strong predictor of relative job satisfaction among specialists, but not among family physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18581616      PMCID: PMC2443622          DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2008.3.375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Croat Med J        ISSN: 0353-9504            Impact factor:   1.351


  17 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes of physician job satisfaction: a narrative review, implications, and directions for future research.

Authors:  Eric S Williams; Asheley Cockrell Skinner
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

2.  [Burn-out in Spanish general practitioners].

Authors:  M Esteva; C Larraz; J k Soler; H Yaman
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Psychosocial and professional characteristics of burnout in Swiss primary care practitioners: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Catherine Goehring; Martine Bouvier Gallacchi; Beat Künzi; Patrick Bovier
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Unconventional therapies and general practice: implications for academic medicine.

Authors:  Wolfgang Spiegel; Francesco Carelli; Manfred Maier
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  [Work-related behavior and experience of physicians in the third to eighth year of their professional life].

Authors:  Edgar Von Voltmer; Ulf Kieschke; Claudia Spahn
Journal:  Z Psychosom Med Psychother       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.791

6.  Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care.

Authors:  David Grembowski; David Paschane; Paula Diehr; Wayne Katon; Diane Martin; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Development of the emergency physician job satisfaction measurement instrument.

Authors:  S Lloyd; D Streiner; E Hahn; S Shannon
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.469

8.  Authoritarianism's role in medicine.

Authors:  J M Merrill; L F Laux; R Lorimor; J I Thornby; C Vallbona
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.378

9.  Motivation for medical school: the relationship to gender and specialty preferences in a nationwide sample.

Authors:  P Vaglum; J Wiers-Jenssen; O Ekeberg
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Sex bias in graduate admissions: data from berkeley.

Authors:  P J Bickel; E A Hammel; J W O'connell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.