Literature DB >> 18580739

A randomized study of back school in women with chronic low back pain: quality of life at three, six, and twelve months follow-up.

Sedigheh Sadar Tavafian1, Ahmad Reza Jamshidi, Ali Montazeri.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of the back school program on quality of life in women with chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a controversial debate whether back school program might improve quality of life in back pain patients. This study aimed to address this issue.
METHODS: One hundred and two eligible women were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The 2 groups including back school group who received the back school program plus medication (n = 50) and clinic group who received just medication (n = 52) were compared at 4 points in time. Data were collected at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up using the SF-36 questionnaire. Repeated measures analysis was performed to compare quality of life scores in 2 groups.
RESULTS: Quality of life scores were significantly different between 2 groups throughout the study (P < 0.0001) indicating a better quality of life among intervention group.
CONCLUSION: The back school program might improve the quality of life score in women with chronic low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18580739     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bd31c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  Back Schools for chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Patrícia Parreira; Martijn W Heymans; Maurits W van Tulder; Rosmin Esmail; Bart W Koes; Nolwenn Poquet; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-03

Review 2.  A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Marienke van Middelkoop; Sidney M Rubinstein; Ton Kuijpers; Arianne P Verhagen; Raymond Ostelo; Bart W Koes; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; A T Apeldoorn; A Chiarotto; R J E M Smeets; R W J G Ostelo; J Guzman; M W van Tulder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-18

Review 4.  The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Tom Bjørkli; Philip Bright; Dévan Rajendran; Rachelle Buchbinder; Martin Underwood; David Evans; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Determinants of quality of life in individuals with chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aleena Agnus Tom; Eslavath Rajkumar; Romate John; Allen Joshua George
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2022-01-05

6.  Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: the need to present minimal important differences units in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Silvia Gianola; Anita Andreano; Greta Castellini; Lorenzo Moja; Maria Grazia Valsecchi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 7.  Back schools for the treatment of chronic low back pain: possibility of benefit but no convincing evidence after 47 years of research-systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sebastian Straube; Markus Harden; Heiko Schröder; Barbora Arendacka; Xiangning Fan; R Andrew Moore; Tim Friede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.926

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.