Literature DB >> 18580509

Selective nonoperative management of low-grade blunt pancreatic injury: are we there yet?

Juan C Duchesne1, Robert Schmieg, Saleem Islam, Jacob Olivier, Norman McSwain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management (NOM) of low-grade blunt pancreatic injuries (LGBPI) diagnosed by computed tomographic (CT) abnormalities of the pancreas in the adult hemodynamically stable (HDS) patient has not been previously defined. We report our experience of patients with LGBPI at a single Level I Trauma Center.
METHODS: Adult HDS patients during a 5-year period with blunt pancreatic injuries with an abbreviated injury score of </=2 were identified through the hospital trauma registry. Management, complications, and outcome were reviewed. Patients who underwent initial emergency laparotomy, died on hospital day one, or had a Glasgow Coma Scale of three were excluded. Failure of NOM was defined by need for subsequent exploratory laparotomy or development of a pancreatic complication. Data are reported as mean +/- SEM.
RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were identified as having blunt pancreatic injury of which 35, with pancreatic abbreviated injury score of </=2, were blunt HDS patients with abdominal CT evidence of pancreatic injury. Amylase elevation was noted in 23 of 35 (68.5%) patients with positive CT scan findings of LGBPI. Study population consisted of 20 male patients and 15 female patients, age 32 +/- 13.22, injury severity score 21 +/- 10.08, systolic pressure 123 +/- 27.06 with mean base deficit -3.78 +/- 2. Of these 12 (34.28%) patients had an associated intra-abdominal solid organ injury. Five patients failed NOM (F-NOM), one had missed small bowel injury, three had pancreatic abscess, of which one developed a pancreatic fistula which resolved with medical management, and one F-NOM for blunt liver injury with missed bowel injury. No death in the F-NOM group and two deaths (5.71%) in the successful NOM (S-NOM) group unrelated to the pancreas. The average length of stay was 11 days +/- 9.71 days.
CONCLUSION: NOM of LGBPI diagnosed by CT was successful in the majority of HDS patients, with low morbidity and mortality. We propose a management algorithm for NOM of LGBPI in which the role for early ductal injury detection with endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatogram or magnetic retrograde cholangio-pancreatogram should be incorporated to better analyze the most appropriate treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18580509     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318176c00d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  14 in total

1.  The epidemiology of and outcome from pancreatoduodenal trauma in the UK, 1989-2013.

Authors:  D A O'Reilly; O Bouamra; A Kausar; D J Malde; E J Dickson; F Lecky
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Trauma Whipple: do or don’t after severe pancreaticoduodenal injuries? An analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB).

Authors:  Gwendolyn M van der Wilden; D Dante Yeh; John O Hwabejire; Eric N Klein; Peter J Fagenholz; David R King; Marc A de Moya; Yuchiao Chang; George C Velmahos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what's new?

Authors:  D A Potoka; B A Gaines; A Leppäniemi; A B Peitzman
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Blunt pancreatic trauma: A persistent diagnostic conundrum?

Authors:  Atin Kumar; Ananya Panda; Shivanand Gamanagatti
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-28

Review 5.  Camel-related pancreatico-duodenal injuries: a report of three cases and review of literature.

Authors:  F M Abu-Zidan; A F Hefny; H Mousa; F C Torab; I Hassan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  The efficacy of four-slice helical CT in evaluating pancreatic trauma: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Wei-Jing Lee; Ning-Ping Foo; Hung-Jung Lin; Yen-Chang Huang; Kuo-Tai Chen
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2011-01-07

7.  Magnitude, Severity, and Outcome of Traumatic Pancreatic Injury at a Level I Trauma Center in India.

Authors:  Amit Gupta; Subodh Kumar; Sanjay Kumar Yadav; Biplab Mishra; Maneesh Singhal; Atin Kumar; Pramod Garg
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 8.  Imaging of blunt pancreatic trauma.

Authors:  Satinder Rekhi; Stephan W Anderson; James T Rhea; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-04-25

9.  Two-stage pancreatic head resection after previous damage control surgery in trauma: two rare case reports.

Authors:  Jorge Paulino; Emanuel Vigia; Miguel Cunha; Edgar Amorim
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 10.  Pancreatic trauma: a concise review.

Authors:  Uma Debi; Ravinder Kaur; Kaushal Kishor Prasad; Saroj Kant Sinha; Anindita Sinha; Kartar Singh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.