Literature DB >> 18580256

Current patterns in the use of diagnostic tests in dry eye evaluation.

Janine Smith1, Kelly K Nichols, Edward K Baldwin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify the roles of objective signs and subjective symptoms in the diagnosis and management of dry eye by describing their use by a group of expert practitioners. Dry eye signs and symptoms do not always correlate well, and there is currently some controversy over the ideal roles of signs and symptoms and their actual use in clinical practice.
METHODS: A balanced panel of 16 participants in a scientific roundtable on dry eye reviewed 4 patient case studies and completed surveys ranking common diagnostic procedures assessing symptoms and signs by the order in which they would be used.
RESULTS: Symptom assessment was the predominant diagnostic method. The objective tests most commonly used during the initial examination were tear breakup time (93%), corneal staining (85%), tear film assessment (76%), conjunctival staining (74%), and the Schirmer test (54%). Most panelists used multiple tests, with a median of 6 tests used in the initial examination.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective symptoms and objective signs are both important in the diagnosis and management of dry eye, with the patient's symptoms and history playing a critical role. Most clinicians use objective signs in dry eye management. However, currently available diagnostic tests do not correlate reliably with symptom severity. Research aimed at developing accurate, objective, responsive measures of dry eye severity is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18580256     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181605b95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  20 in total

1.  Agreement between Automated and Traditional Measures of Tear Film Breakup.

Authors:  Stephanie M Cox; Kelly K Nichols; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Comparison of the Schirmer I test with and without topical anesthesia for diagnosing dry eye.

Authors:  Na Li; Xin-Guo Deng; Mei-Feng He
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Dry eye disease: A review of diagnostic approaches and treatments.

Authors:  Hui Lin; Samuel C Yiu
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-24

4.  Comparison of mucin levels at the ocular surface of postmenopausal women with and without a history of dry eye.

Authors:  Ilene K Gipson; Sandra J Spurr-Michaud; Michelle Senchyna; Robert Ritter; Debra Schaumberg
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 5.  The effect of hinge location on corneal sensation and dry eye after LASIK: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-fan Feng; Ji-guo Yu; Dan-dan Wang; Jun-hua Li; Jin-hai Huang; Jie-liang Shi; Ting Ye; Qin-mei Wang; Yun-e Zhao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Methods of Tear Film Stability Assessment: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Michael T M Wang; Jennifer P Craig
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Long-term Natural History of Dry Eye Disease from the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Lienert; Laura Tarko; Miki Uchino; William G Christen; Debra A Schaumberg
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Measurement of ocular surface protection under natural blink conditions.

Authors:  Richard Abelson; Keith J Lane; Endri Angjeli; Patrick Johnston; George Ousler; Douglas Montgomery
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-22

9.  Evaluation of plasma vitamin A and E levels and tear film changes in patients with psoriasis vulgaris.

Authors:  Helin Deniz Demir; Erdinç Aydın; Engin Sezer; Hüseyin Yardım
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-19

Review 10.  A Review of Imaging Biomarkers of the Ocular Surface.

Authors:  William W Binotti; Betul Bayraktutar; M Cuneyt Ozmen; Stephanie M Cox; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.