Literature DB >> 18580150

Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term stability.

Chun-Ming Chen1, Huey-Er Lee, Chia-Fu Yang, Yee-Shyong Shen, I-Yueh Huang, Yu-Chuan Tseng, Sheng-Tsung Lai.   

Abstract

Various techniques and modifications have been introduced in the treatment of mandibular prognathism. However, there are still few reports concerning long-term stability, especially using the intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) method. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term stability for correction of mandibular prognathism using IVRO. Twenty-five mandibular prognathism patients were treated by bilateral IVRO, and were evaluated cephalometrically by reference to the menton. A set of 3 standardized lateral cephalograms were obtained from each subject preoperatively (T1), immediately postoperatively (T2), and after 2 years postoperatively (T3). Relapse was defined as forward movement of menton after the 2-year follow-up. The mean setback of the menton was 12.8 mm in horizontal direction and 0.9 mm downward in vertical direction. The average follow-up was 33.9 months. The mean relapse was 1.3 mm (10.2% = 1.3 of 12.8) in forward direction and 0.6 mm in upward direction. There was no significant movement in the vertical direction. However, significant relapse was shown in the horizontal direction, even though the amount was small. The long-term stability of our present study suggested that IVRO is useful for correction of mandibular prognathism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18580150     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318153f3ee

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  7 in total

1.  Stability of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Comparison between positioning screws and plate.

Authors:  Nasser Nooh
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-10-29

2.  Assessment of Relapse Following Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Mandibular Setback and Short-term Immobilization.

Authors:  Koroush Taheri Talesh; Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi; Mahdi Sazavar; Javad Yazdani
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-07-19

Review 3.  Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms.

Authors:  Hwi-Dong Jung; Sang Yoon Kim; Hyung-Sik Park; Young-Soo Jung
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-05-28

4.  Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Japanese class III asymmetric patients.

Authors:  Talat Al-Gunaid; Masaki Yamaki; Ritsuo Takagi; Isao Saito
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2012-07

5.  Relationship between Frontal Gap and Postoperative Stability in the Treatment of Mandibular Prognathism.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Tseng; Kun-Jung Hsu; Ker-Kong Chen; Ju-Hui Wu; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Skeletal stability after maxillary step osteotomy compared with original Le Fort I osteotomy during one-year of follow-up.

Authors:  Kazuto Kurohara; Nobuyoshi Tomomatsu; Koichi Nakakuki; Naoya Arai; Tetsuya Yoda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Effect of Pterygomasseteric Sling's Area in the Postoperative Stability after Mandibular Setback Surgery.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chen; Chun-Chan Ting; Jung-Hsuan Cheng; Kun-Jung Hsu; Yu-Chuan Tseng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.