Literature DB >> 18579709

Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care--a controlled study.

Cliodna Am McNulty1, Michael Thomas, Joanne Bowen, Charles Buckley, Andre Charlett, David Gelb, Chris Foy, John Sloss, Stuart Smellie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary care clinicians suggest that staff education is needed to increase chlamydia testing appropriately.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if interactive workshops and modified laboratory request forms could increase testing and case detection. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cluster randomized controlled study, using modified Zelen's design, examining the effect of workshops and modified request forms on primary care clinicians' chlamydia specimen submission and case positivity rate. STUDY POPULATION: 82 general practices in six geographical clusters within five primary care trusts (PCTs) in Gloucestershire and County Durham and Darlington. INTERVENTION: Practices within geographical clusters were randomly assigned to workshops on chlamydia or a control consisting of comparable workshops on the management of urinary symptoms, held in PCT-protected learning time. Half the practices were randomized to receive modified laboratory request forms. Staff were unaware that they were part of a study.
RESULTS: Interactive workshops increased chlamydia testing in 16- to 24-year-old women by 33% in intervention practices compared to controls with effect persisting at 10 months (P = 0.003). No associated rise in the number of chlamydia infections was detected (P = 0.91), suggesting that increased testing may have occurred in a lower risk population. Modified forms did not change test submission (P = 0.75).
CONCLUSIONS: Interactive workshops for general practices can be used to successfully increase chlamydia-testing rates. Chlamydia detection rates will need to be monitored as this type of educational programme may not increase absolute numbers of chlamydia infections detected, if patients at lower risk of infection are inappropriately tested. Other interventions may need to be combined with the workshops, to reach sufficiently high chlamydia screening rates to significantly reduce prevalence of chlamydial infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18579709     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmn032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  13 in total

1.  How usual is usual care in pragmatic intervention studies in primary care? An overview of recent trials.

Authors:  Antonia F H Smelt; Gerda M van der Weele; Jeanet W Blom; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Willem J J Assendelft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Chlamydia screening among young women: individual- and provider-level differences in testing.

Authors:  Sarah E Wiehe; Marc B Rosenman; Jane Wang; Barry P Katz; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Are we missing the importance of missing values in HIV prevention randomized clinical trials? Review and recommendations.

Authors:  Ofer Harel; Jennifer Pellowski; Seth Kalichman
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2012-08

Review 4.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Mary Ann O'Brien; Lisa Forsén; Liv Merete Reinar; Mbah P Okwen; Tanya Horsley; Christopher J Rose
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-15

5.  "...they should be offering it": a qualitative study to investigate young peoples' attitudes towards chlamydia screening in GP surgeries.

Authors:  Angela H Hogan; Rebecca S Howell-Jones; Elizabeth Pottinger; Louise M Wallace; Cliodna Am McNulty
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca J Guy; Hammad Ali; Bette Liu; Simone Poznanski; James Ward; Basil Donovan; John Kaldor; Jane Hocking
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: a modified Zelen prospective Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.

Authors:  Cliodna A M McNulty; Angela H Hogan; Ellie J Ricketts; Louise Wallace; Isabel Oliver; Rona Campbell; Sebastian Kalwij; Elaine O'Connell; Andre Charlett
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Do sexual health campaigns work? An outcome evaluation of a media campaign to increase chlamydia testing among young people aged 15-24 in England.

Authors:  Maya Gobin; Neville Verlander; Carla Maurici; Angie Bone; Anthony Nardone
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Using educational outreach and a financial incentive to increase general practices' contribution to chlamydia screening in South-East London 2003-2011.

Authors:  Sebastian Kalwij; Sarah French; Rumbi Mugezi; Paula Baraitser
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  A qualitative study exploring the acceptability of the McNulty-Zelen design for randomised controlled trials evaluating educational interventions.

Authors:  Cliodna McNulty; Ellie J Ricketts; Claire Rugman; Angela Hogan; Andre Charlett; Rona Campbell
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.