Literature DB >> 18579626

Inequalities in caesarean section: influence of the type of maternity care and social class in an area with a national health system.

J Salvador1, G Cano-Serral, M Rodríguez-Sanz, A Lladonosa, C Borrell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the impact of social class inequalities and type of maternity unit in the use of caesarean sections (CSs) among residents in an urban area of Southern Europe.
DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. The study population consisted of 2186 women resident in Barcelona city who gave birth to an infant without any birth defect during 1994-2003. The dependent variable was the type of delivery. Maternal age, social class and type of maternity unit (public or private) were independent variables. Maternal age-adjusted logistic regression models were used.
RESULTS: 30% of deliveries ended in CS; 70% of less privileged women delivered in public maternity units and 72% of more privileged women delivered in private centres. A relationship between CS and social class was observed (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7), but disappeared when the analysis was done separately for each stratum of type of maternity unit (both ORs 1.0). In contrast, a relationship between CS and type of maternity unit was found (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.9 to 2.7), which persisted when the analysis was done separately for each stratum of social class.
CONCLUSION: Although strongly related to higher social class, the main determinant of the high proportion of CSs was delivering in private maternity units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18579626     DOI: 10.1136/jech.2007.071977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  7 in total

1.  Social inequalities in the organization of pregnancy care in a universally funded public health care system.

Authors:  Georgina Sutherland; Jane Yelland; Stephanie Brown
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

2.  Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Payments and quality of care in private for-profit and public hospitals in Greece.

Authors:  Elias Kondilis; Magda Gavana; Stathis Giannakopoulos; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Nikolaos Dombros; Alexis Benos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  The influence of both individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980-2000.

Authors:  Lesley Fairley; Ruth Dundas; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Do private hospitals outperform public hospitals regarding efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care in the European Union? A literature review.

Authors:  Florien M Kruse; Niek W Stadhouders; Eddy M Adang; Stef Groenewoud; Patrick P T Jeurissen
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2018-03-02

6.  Publicly insured caesarean sections in private hospitals: a repeated cross-sectional analysis in Chile.

Authors:  Florencia Borrescio-Higa; Nieves Valdés
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jussara M Silva; Airton T Stein; Holger J Schünemann; Ronaldo Bordin; Ricardo Kuchenbecker; Maria de Lourdes Drachler
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.