Literature DB >> 18579270

Biomonitoring Equivalents (BE) dossier for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (CAS No. 94-75-7).

Lesa L Aylward1, Sean M Hays.   

Abstract

Recent efforts by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other researchers have resulted in a growing database of measured concentrations of chemical substances in blood or urine samples taken from the general population. However, few tools exist to assist in the interpretation of the measured values in a health risk context. Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs) are defined as the concentration or range of concentrations of a chemical or its metabolite in a biological medium (blood, urine, or other medium) that is consistent with an existing health-based exposure guideline. This document reviews available pharmacokinetic data and models for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and applies these data and models to existing health-based exposure guidance values from the US Environmental Protection Agency to estimate corresponding BE values for 2,4-D in plasma and urine. These values can be used as screening tools for evaluation of biomonitoring data for 2,4-D in the context of the existing USEPA risk assessment and for prioritization of the potential need for additional risk assessment efforts for 2,4-D.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18579270     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  5 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Carcinogenic Outcomes and Potential Mechanisms from Exposure to 2,4-D and MCPA in the Environment.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-26

Review 2.  Biomonitoring data for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in the United States and Canada: interpretation in a public health risk assessment context using Biomonitoring Equivalents.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Marsha K Morgan; Tye E Arbuckle; Dana B Barr; Carol J Burns; Bruce H Alexander; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Evaluation of biomonitoring data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Christopher R Kirman; Rita Schoeny; Christopher J Portier; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Elimination and detoxification of 2,4-D by Umbelopsis isabellina with the involvement of cytochrome P450.

Authors:  Justyna Nykiel-Szymańska; Paulina Stolarek; Przemysław Bernat
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Association between increasing agricultural use of 2,4-D and population biomarkers of exposure: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2014.

Authors:  Marlaina S Freisthler; C Rebecca Robbins; Charles M Benbrook; Heather A Young; David M Haas; Paul D Winchester; Melissa J Perry
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.