| Literature DB >> 18578877 |
Theresa Hague1, Andrea Petroczi, Paul L R Andrews, James Barker, Declan P Naughton.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Considerable research has been directed towards the roles of metal ions in nutrition with metal ion toxicity attracting particular attention. The aim of this study is to measure the levels of metal ions found in selected beverages (red wine, stout and apple juice) and to determine their potential detrimental effects via calculation of the Target Hazard Quotients (THQ) for 250 mL daily consumption.Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18578877 PMCID: PMC2443149 DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-2-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1ICP-MS results for intact beverages in the concentration ranges of high (up to 1250 ppb); medium (up to 9 ppb); low (up to 1.5 ppb). a = above working range.
Figure 2ICP-MS results for intact and ultra-filtered red wine in the concentration ranges of high (up to 1250 ppb); medium (up to 9 ppb); low (up to 1.5 ppb). a = above working range.
Summary of Tukey HSD post hoc comparisons (p < 0.05) of apple juice, stout and red wine
| Differences | Elements |
| In all pairs (i.e. Red wine ↔ Apple juice, Red wine ↔ Stout, Apple juice ↔ Stout) | Cs, Co, Cu, Mn, Rb, Tl, Zn |
| Red wine ↔ (Apple juice and Stout) | Ce, Cr, Dy, Er, Eu, Gd, Ho, La, Lu, Ni, Pr, Nd, Pb, Sm, Sn, Tb, Tm, U, V, Y, Yb |
| Stout ↔ (Apple juice and Red wine) | Cd |
↔ denotes difference
Figure 3Individual Target Hazard Quotients for all beverages for males (blue) and females (red). * above working range.
Figure 4Combined Target Hazard Quotients for apple juice and stout expressed as percentages.
Figure 5Combined Target Hazard Quotients for red wine. * above working range.