OBJECTIVES: To assess our experiences of using hand-held computers (personal digital assistants, PDAs) for direct data capture in a large community-based geo-referenced survey in rural Burkina Faso, highlighting benefits and lessons learnt from their use. METHODS: A population-based geo-referenced survey of over 500 000 people was undertaken using PDAs with in-built GPS receivers and the resulting database analysed in terms of successful completion, error rates and interview durations. RESULTS: Surveys were successfully completed for 84 861 households (98.3%) by 127 interviewers. The data input error rate was assessed at 0.24%, with more than half of the errors being made by less than 10% of the interviewers. Faster interviewers were not less accurate. Time-stamped and geo-referenced data allowed reconstruction of particular interviewer-day activities. CONCLUSIONS: Although the survey setting was challenging, the feasibility of using direct data capture on a large scale was well established. We learnt that, with more experience, we could have made better use of real-time entry and quality control checking procedures. The work involved in designing and setting up a complex survey on PDAs prior to data collection should not be underestimated.
OBJECTIVES: To assess our experiences of using hand-held computers (personal digital assistants, PDAs) for direct data capture in a large community-based geo-referenced survey in rural Burkina Faso, highlighting benefits and lessons learnt from their use. METHODS: A population-based geo-referenced survey of over 500 000 people was undertaken using PDAs with in-built GPS receivers and the resulting database analysed in terms of successful completion, error rates and interview durations. RESULTS: Surveys were successfully completed for 84 861 households (98.3%) by 127 interviewers. The data input error rate was assessed at 0.24%, with more than half of the errors being made by less than 10% of the interviewers. Faster interviewers were not less accurate. Time-stamped and geo-referenced data allowed reconstruction of particular interviewer-day activities. CONCLUSIONS: Although the survey setting was challenging, the feasibility of using direct data capture on a large scale was well established. We learnt that, with more experience, we could have made better use of real-time entry and quality control checking procedures. The work involved in designing and setting up a complex survey on PDAs prior to data collection should not be underestimated.
Authors: Ying Zhou; Neil F Lobo; Adam Wolkon; John E Gimnig; Alpha Malishee; Jennifer Stevenson; Frank H Collins; Greg Madey Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Sennen Hounton; Luc De Bernis; Julia Hussein; Wendy J Graham; Isabella Danel; Peter Byass; Elizabeth M Mason Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2013-01-02 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Kamala Thriemer; Benedikt Ley; Shaali M Ame; Mahesh K Puri; Ramadhan Hashim; Na Yoon Chang; Luluwa A Salim; R Leon Ochiai; Thomas F Wierzba; John D Clemens; Lorenz von Seidlein; Jaqueline L Deen; Said M Ali; Mohammad Ali Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2012-02-21
Authors: Carina King; Jenny Hall; Masford Banda; James Beard; Jon Bird; Peter Kazembe; Ed Fottrell Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Shuyi Zhang; Qiong Wu; Michelle Hmmt van Velthoven; Li Chen; Josip Car; Igor Rudan; Yanfeng Zhang; Ye Li; Robert W Scherpbier Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Abraham D Flaxman; Andrea Stewart; Jonathan C Joseph; Nurul Alam; Sayed Saidul Alam; Hafizur Chowdhury; Meghan D Mooney; Rasika Rampatige; Hazel Remolador; Diozele Sanvictores; Peter T Serina; Peter Kim Streatfield; Veronica Tallo; Christopher J L Murray; Bernardo Hernandez; Alan D Lopez; Ian Douglas Riley Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2018-02-01