Literature DB >> 18578678

Optometric referrals to retina specialists: evaluation and triage via teleophthalmology.

Chris Hanson1, Matthew T S Tennant, Chris J Rudnisky.   

Abstract

A retrospective noncomparative consecutive case series was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a novel teleophthalmology program linking optometrists to retina specialists in Alberta, Canada. One hundred seventy-one patients, referred by optometrists via teleophthalmology to a group retina practice between June 2004 and May 2006 underwent stereoscopic, mydriatic digital photography. Images were transmitted to a secure Web server and analyzed by a retina specialist. Diagnosis and recommendations were sent back to the optometrist and, if necessary, patients were referred for additional testing and clinical evaluation. A chart review of all clinical encounters was performed and the data was tabulated. Demographic features, diagnosis, testing, treatment, distance and time traveled by patient, durations between telemedicine referral, teleophthalmology consultation, in-person consultation, testing, and treatment were recorded. One hundred seventy patients were assessed via teleophthalmology for a total of 190 consultations. Eighty-nine patients (52.0%) required conventional in-person consultation with a referral completion success of 92.1% (82 patients). Fifty of these patients underwent additional diagnostic testing including fluorescein angiography (41), optical coherence tomography (14), laboratory testing (5), visual fields (2), carotid Doppler ultrasound (2), and ocular ultrasound (2). Twenty-five patients required surgical or medical treatment including focal argon laser (10), photodynamic therapy (8), panretinal photocoagulation (2), vitrectomy (2), scleral buckle (1), and other procedures (8). Average wait time between telemedicine referral and teleophthalmology review of images by the retina specialist was 1.9 days (maximum = 20 days). For those patients requiring office evaluation, the average wait time between teleophthalmology referral and in-person evaluation was 25.1 days. Twenty-one of the 25 patients (84.0%) requiring treatment underwent examination, testing, and treatment in a single day. When compared to conventional consultation methods, teleophthalmology reduced average travel distance and time by 219.1 km and 2.7 hours, respectively. Teleophthalmology reduced office visits to the retina specialist by 48% while improving the efficiency of clinical examination, testing, and treatment. Patients benefited through reduced travel time and distance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18578678     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  10 in total

1.  Improving access to eye care: teleophthalmology in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Mancho Ng; Nawaaz Nathoo; Chris J Rudnisky; Matthew T S Tennant
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01

2.  Environmental aspects of health care in the Grampian NHS region and the place of telehealth.

Authors:  Richard Wootton; Alex Tait; Amanda Croft
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.184

3.  Teleophthalmology with optical coherence tomography imaging in community optometry. Evaluation of a quality improvement for macular patients.

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; Ian Wallwork; David Haider; Kashif Qureshi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-01

4.  Collaborative care of non-urgent macular disease: a study of inter-optometric referrals.

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Wireless, Web-Based Interactive Control of Optical Coherence Tomography with Mobile Devices.

Authors:  Rajvi Mehta; Derek Nankivil; David J Zielinski; Gar Waterman; Brenton Keller; Alexander T Limkakeng; Regis Kopper; Joseph A Izatt; Anthony N Kuo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  The MOLES System for Planning Management of Melanocytic Choroidal Tumors: Is It Safe?

Authors:  Kelsey A Roelofs; Roderick O'Day; Lamis Al Harby; Amit K Arora; Victoria M L Cohen; Mandeep S Sagoo; Bertil Damato
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Current Teleophthalmology Services in New Zealand Compared to the Four Comparable Countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, United States of America (USA) and Canada.

Authors:  Liam Walsh; Sheng Chiong Hong; Renoh Johnson Chalakkal; Kelechi C Ogbuehi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-04

8.  Retrospective Review of Ocular Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Detection of Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  Bradley Jacobsen; Sari Lahham; Shadi Lahham; Amy Patel; Sophia Spann; John C Fox
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-02

9.  Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Teleophthalmology System Using a Low-Cost Fundus Camera.

Authors:  Sareh Keshvardoost; Kambiz Bahaadinibeigy; Hashem Shadman; AmirKhosro Ghaseminejad Tafreshi; Mohammad Reza Baneshi
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2020-03

10.  Impact of COVID-19 at the Ocular Level: A Citation Network Study.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena; Clara Martinez-Perez; Cesar Villa-Collar; Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.