Literature DB >> 18578154

Environmental impacts and costs of solid waste: a comparison of landfill and incineration.

Ari Rabl1, Joseph V Spadaro, Assaad Zoughaib.   

Abstract

The methodology for evaluating the impacts and damage costs ('external costs') due to pollution from waste treatment is described and the results are presented, based on the ExternE project series of the European Commission. The damage costs of landfill and incineration of municipal solid waste are compared, with due account for energy and materials recovery, as well as possible differences in transport distance. We have not been able to quantify the total damage costs of leachates because of the complexity of the environmental pathways and of the long time horizon of some persistent pollutants, but we consider an extreme scenario to show that they are not worth worrying about in the sense that reducing the pollutants in leachates beyond current regulations would bring negligible benefit in comparison with the abatement of other sources of the same pollutants. The damage costs due to the construction of the waste treatment facility are negligible. The damage costs of waste transport, which are illustrated by an arbitrary choice of a 100 km round trip by a 16 tonne truck, are also negligible. The benefits of materials recovery make a small contribution to the total damage cost. The only significant contributions come from direct emissions (of the landfill or incinerator) and from avoided emissions due to energy recovery (from an incinerator). Damage costs for incineration range from about 4 to 21 EUR tonne waste(-1), and they are extremely dependent on the assumed scenario for energy recovery. For landfill the cost ranges from about 10 to 13 EUR tonne waste(-1); it is dominated by greenhouse gas emissions because only a fraction of the CH4 can be captured (here assumed to be 70%). Amenity costs (odour, visual impact, noise) are highly site-specific and we only cite results from a literature survey which indicates that such costs could make a significant contribution, very roughly on the order of 1 EUR tonne waste(-1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18578154     DOI: 10.1177/0734242X07080755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag Res


  5 in total

1.  Applying waste management scenarios in the Peloponnese Region in Greece: a critical analysis in the frame of life cycle assessment.

Authors:  I-S Antonopoulos; A Karagiannidis; T Tsatsarelis; G Perkoulidis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Technology innovations for food security in Singapore: A case study of future food systems for an increasingly natural resource-scarce world.

Authors:  Wai Kit Mok; Yong Xing Tan; Wei Ning Chen
Journal:  Trends Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 12.563

3.  Health impact assessment of waste management facilities in three European countries.

Authors:  Francesco Forastiere; Chiara Badaloni; Kees de Hoogh; Martin K von Kraus; Marco Martuzzi; Francesco Mitis; Lubica Palkovicova; Daniela Porta; Philipp Preiss; Andrea Ranzi; Carlo A Perucci; David Briggs
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Optimizing emissions and carbon credit from integrated solid waste and wastewater management: A MATLAB-based model with a Graphical User Interface (v1).

Authors:  Amani Maalouf; Mutasem El-Fadel
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-02-24

Review 5.  Review of Current Healthcare Waste Management Methods and Their Effect on Global Health.

Authors:  Christina Kenny; Anushree Priyadarshini
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.