BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) targeting the left ventricular posteroseptum (LVPS) and posterior papillary muscle (PPM) terminates or prevents ventricular fibrillation (VF) in rabbit and dog hearts. However, whether the mechanism of VF maintenance is reentry or focal Purkinje firing is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the present study the effects of RFCA (endocardial ablation of PPM+LVPS in 7 dogs and 7 swine), left ventricular anterolateral wall ablation (LVAL in 7 dogs), and the cut-and-sew operation (CSO: along the left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW) beside PPM in 7 swine) on VF inducibility were compared. (1) VF inducibility was decreased from 100+/-0% to 21.9+/-31.2% (p<0.0001) by PPM+LVPS endocardial ablation, but not by LVAL ablation in dogs. (2) LVPW CSO reduced VF inducibility (100+/-0% to 43.6+/-9.5%, p<0.0001) in swine. (3) In contrast to the canine Purkinje network, which is mostly localized to the subendocardium, the swine Purkinje network extends to the subepicardial layer with a higher density (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Both PPM+LVPS ablation (Purkinje destruction) in dogs and LVPW CSO (blocking reentry) in swine reduce VF inducibility, suggesting that in both species focal firing from the Purkinje network and reentry around the PPM contributes to the maintenance of VF.
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) targeting the left ventricular posteroseptum (LVPS) and posterior papillary muscle (PPM) terminates or prevents ventricular fibrillation (VF) in rabbit and dog hearts. However, whether the mechanism of VF maintenance is reentry or focal Purkinje firing is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the present study the effects of RFCA (endocardial ablation of PPM+LVPS in 7 dogs and 7 swine), left ventricular anterolateral wall ablation (LVAL in 7 dogs), and the cut-and-sew operation (CSO: along the left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW) beside PPM in 7 swine) on VF inducibility were compared. (1) VF inducibility was decreased from 100+/-0% to 21.9+/-31.2% (p<0.0001) by PPM+LVPS endocardial ablation, but not by LVAL ablation in dogs. (2) LVPW CSO reduced VF inducibility (100+/-0% to 43.6+/-9.5%, p<0.0001) in swine. (3) In contrast to the canine Purkinje network, which is mostly localized to the subendocardium, the swine Purkinje network extends to the subepicardial layer with a higher density (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Both PPM+LVPS ablation (Purkinje destruction) in dogs and LVPW CSO (blocking reentry) in swine reduce VF inducibility, suggesting that in both species focal firing from the Purkinje network and reentry around the PPM contributes to the maintenance of VF.
Authors: David E Krummen; Justin Hayase; Stephen P Vampola; Gordon Ho; Amir A Schricker; Gautam G Lalani; Tina Baykaner; Taylor M Coe; Paul Clopton; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Jeffrey H Omens; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2015-09-06
Authors: Kang-An Cheng; Derek J Dosdall; Li Li; Jack M Rogers; Raymond E Ideker; Jian Huang Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: David E Krummen; Justin Hayase; David J Morris; Jeffrey Ho; Miriam R Smetak; Paul Clopton; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Derek J Dosdall; Jose Osorio; Robert P Robichaux; Jian Huang; Li Li; Raymond E Ideker Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 6.343