Literature DB >> 18577483

Endoluminal resection for sessile neoplasia in the GI tract is associated with a low recurrence rate and a high 5-year survival rate.

Andrew Y Wang1, Nuzhat A Ahmad, Jeffrey S Zaidman, Colleen M Brensinger, James D Lewis, William B Long, Michael L Kochman, Gregory G Ginsberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoluminal resection (ELR) is an alternative to surgery for the removal of superficial neoplastic lesions of the GI tract. We previously reported a complete resection (CR) rate of 89% when using ELR techniques. However, the long-term efficacy of ELR for the eradication of sessile lesions, as well as patient survival after ELR, is not known.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term recurrence rate of GI lesions that were completely resected by ELR and to determine the long-term (5-year) survival rate of patients who had ELR for GI lesions that contained high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or adenocarcinoma (AdCa).
DESIGN: From a larger cohort of 92 consecutive patients who had undergone ELR of sessile lesions from 1997 to 2000, long-term follow-up was obtained. Patient survival rates were considered in terms of disease-specific mortality.
RESULTS: Endoscopic follow-up was possible in 44 patients (48%) and 46 lesions (46%). At the time of the initial ELR, the median age was 68.5 years. The median duration of follow-up was 3.8 years after ELR (range 7 months to 8.1 years). Resected lesions were located in the esophagus (25%), stomach (11%), duodenum (25%), colon (27%), and rectum (11%). Post-ELR histopathology consisted of adenomas (46%), HGD (16%), AdCa (11%), lymphoma (2%), leiomyoma (2%), carcinoid (2%), lesions indeterminate for dysplasia (2%), and nondysplastic lesions (18%). CR was achieved in 42 patients and 44 lesions (96%) after initial ELR procedures (range 1-3). Thirty-seven of 39 neoplastic lesions (95%) in this cohort achieved initial CR. Two lesions (found in 2 patients) that did not achieve initial CR were excluded from analysis. Four of 37 neoplastic lesions (10.8%) that underwent successful ELR had local recurrence of neoplasia (median time to recurrence was 1.9 years). Two of the 4 neoplastic recurrences were successfully eradicated by subsequent endoscopic techniques (95% overall eradication rate). Long-term endoscopic follow-up was possible in 12 of 20 patients (60%) with HGD or AdCa who achieved initial CR. These 12 patients had HGD (n = 7) or AdCa (n = 5) and were observed for an average of 4.9 years (range 1.4-7.9 years) after an ELR. Two of these patients died during follow-up, but only 1 death (8%) was lesion related. When comparing post-ELR pathology, HGD and AdCa trended toward an increased risk of recurrence compared with other neoplastic lesions (hazard ratio 4.75 [95% CI, 0.49-46.35], P = .18). LIMITATIONS: A retrospective study with 52% of patients lost to long-term endoscopic follow-up, which limited the sample size and the number of events.
CONCLUSIONS: ELR effectively eradicates sessile neoplastic lesions from the GI tract, with a low recurrence rate (10.8%) at long-term follow-up. Post-ELR surveillance is important, because local recurrences may be amenable to endoscopic eradication. HGD and cancers may carry an increased risk for a local recurrence, with a 5-year disease-specific survival of 92%. This study suggests that ELR is associated with a low recurrence rate for neoplastic lesions and appreciable long-term survival in patients with highly dysplastic lesions. Additional, long-term follow-up studies are necessary to investigate the role of ELR in the treatment of highly dysplastic lesions of the GI tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18577483     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  4 in total

1.  Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Robert J Schenck; Darius A Jahann; James T Patrie; Edward B Stelow; Dawn G Cox; Dushant S Uppal; Bryan G Sauer; Vanessa M Shami; Daniel S Strand; Andrew Y Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Endoluminal Therapy in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Katherine A Kelley; V Liana Tsikitis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

3.  Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal neoplasia is easily learned, efficacious, and safe.

Authors:  Andrew Y Wang; Mary M Flynn; James T Patrie; Dawn G Cox; Wissam Bleibel; James A Mann; Bryan G Sauer; Vanessa M Shami
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Approach to the endoscopic resection of duodenal lesions.

Authors:  Jonathan P Gaspar; Edward B Stelow; Andrew Y Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.