Literature DB >> 18577401

An improved method for the estimation of firing rate dynamics using an optimal digital filter.

Sofiane Cherif1, Kathleen E Cullen, Henrietta L Galiana.   

Abstract

In most neural systems, neurons communicate by means of sequences of action potentials or 'spikes'. Information encoded by spike trains is often quantified in terms of the firing rate which emphasizes the frequency of occurrence of action potentials rather than their exact timing. Common methods for estimating firing rates include the rate histogram, the reciprocal interspike interval, and the spike density function. In this study, we demonstrate the limitations of these aforementioned techniques and propose a simple yet more robust alternative. By convolving the spike train with an optimally designed Kaiser window, we show that more robust estimates of firing rate are obtained for both low and high-frequency inputs. We illustrate our approach by considering spike trains generated by simulated as well as experimental data obtained from single-unit recordings of first-order sensory neurons in the vestibular system. Improvements were seen in the prevention of aliasing, phase and amplitude distortion, as well as in the noise reduction for sinusoidal and more complex input profiles. We review the generality of the approach, and show that it can be adapted to describe neurons with sensory or motor responses that are characterized by marked nonlinearities. We conclude that our method permits more robust estimates of neural dynamics than conventional techniques across all stimulus conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18577401     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  27 in total

1.  Neural heterogeneities influence envelope and temporal coding at the sensory periphery.

Authors:  M Savard; R Krahe; M J Chacron
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Response of vestibular nerve afferents innervating utricle and saccule during passive and active translations.

Authors:  Mohsen Jamali; Soroush G Sadeghi; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Multimodal integration of self-motion cues in the vestibular system: active versus passive translations.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; Jessica X Brooks; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Strong correlations between sensitivity and variability give rise to constant discrimination thresholds across the otolith afferent population.

Authors:  Mohsen Jamali; Jerome Carriot; Maurice J Chacron; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Information transmission and detection thresholds in the vestibular nuclei: single neurons vs. population encoding.

Authors:  Corentin Massot; Maurice J Chacron; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural heterogeneities determine response characteristics to second-, but not first-order stimulus features.

Authors:  Michael G Metzen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Integration of canal and otolith inputs by central vestibular neurons is subadditive for both active and passive self-motion: implication for perception.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Jessica X Brooks; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Cerebellar Prediction of the Dynamic Sensory Consequences of Gravity.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Tuning and timing in mammalian type I hair cells and calyceal synapses.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; Ruth Anne Eatock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Different neural strategies for multimodal integration: comparison of two macaque monkey species.

Authors:  Soroush G Sadeghi; Diana E Mitchell; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.