| Literature DB >> 18577266 |
Amos R Mwakigonja1, Ephata E Kaaya, Edward M Mgaya.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV infection is reported to be associated with some malignant lymphomas (ML) so called AIDS-related lymphomas (ARL), with an aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. The ML frequency, pathogenicity, clinical patterns and possible association with AIDS in Tanzania, are not well documented impeding the development of preventive and therapeutic strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18577266 PMCID: PMC2438337 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Frequency of ML at MNH by age, sex and HIV serostatus
| DIAGNOSIS | AGE (Years) | SEX [NO (%)] | HIV SEROSTATUS [NO (%)] | TOTAL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 91 | 39.01 | 66(64.1)/37(35.9) = .1.8:1 | 5 (25.0) | 15 (75.0) | ||||
| 5 | 70 | 26.42 | 25(64.1)/14(35.9) = | 4 (28.6) | 10 (71.4) | ||||
| 3 | 20 | 8.94 | 21(61.8)/13(38.2) = | 0 (0.0) | 4 (100.0) | ||||
Figure 1Pie chart showing the proportion of different ML types at MNH between 1996 and 2001. Note that NHL formed the largest group.
Figure 2Frequency polygon showing variation of different ML types with time at MNH between 1996 and 2001. Note the increase in frequency of NHL and HD between 1997 and 2000.
Distribution of ML histological subtypes by sex and age
| HISTOLOGY | MEAN AGE (Years) | SEX [NO (%)] | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGNHL | 44.1 | 30(76.9)/9(23.1) | 3.3:1 | |
| HGNHL | 36.0 | 37(57.8)/27(42.2) | 1.4:1 | |
| LP | 34.2 | 3(50.0)/3(50.0) | 1:1 | |
| LD | 70.0 | 0/1(100.0) | N/A | |
| MC | 24.3 | 12(60.0)/8(40.0) | 1.5:1 | |
| NS | 23.0 | 8(80.0)/2(20.0) | 4:1 | |
| NOS* | 2(100.0)/0 | N/A | ||
*Not Otherwise Specified
Figure 3(a) H & E section of a diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLBCL) [high grade NHL]; note the high mitotic index [blue arrows] (× 400). (b) H & E section of a small cell lymphoma [SCL] which is a low-grade NHL (× 400). (c) H & E section of a Hodgkin's disease mixed cellularity (HDMC) case; note the classical Reed-Sternberg (R-S) cell [blue arrows] and eosinophil cells [black arrows] (× 400). (d) H & E section of a BL; note the "starry-sky" appearance due to tingible-body macrophages [black arrows] (× 200).
Figure 4Pie chart showing the proportion of ML serologically screened for HIV antibodies at MNH between 1996 and 2001. Note that a large number of ML at MNH were not screened for HIV.
Distribution of HIV antibody serostatus by histological grade of NHL at MNH (1996–2001)
| GRADE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV SEROSTATUS | LGNHL | HGNHL | TOTAL NO (%) |
| 1 (20.0%) | 4 (80.0%) | 5 (29.4%) | |
| 6 (40.0%) | 9 (60.0%) | 15 (70.6%) | |
2-Tailed p-value = 0.6126 (Fisher Exact Test)
Immunohistochemical characteristics of ML at MNH
| IMMUNOREACTIVITY FOR: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUMOUR | CD20 | CD3 | CD68 | MEAN Ki-67 (% +/HPF) | |
| Reactive (membranous cytoplasmic) in all tumour and infiltrating cells | Reactive (membranous cytoplasmic) in all tumour cells | Focal (membranous cytoplasmic) reactivity in infiltrating T-cells | Focal (membranous cytoplasmic) reactivity in infiltrating phagocytes | 70.0 | |
| Reactive (membranous cytoplasmic) in all tumour and infiltrating cells | Reactive (membranous cytoplasmic) in all tumour cells | Focal (membranous cytoplasmic) reactivity in infiltrating T-cells | Focal (membranous cytoplasmic) reactivity in infiltrating phagocytes | 40.0 | |
| Reactive (membranous cytoplasmic) in all tumour and infiltrating cells | Focal reactivity in infiltrating B-cells while RS and Hodgkin cells negative | Focal reactivity in infiltrating T-cells | Focal (membranous cytoplasmic) reactivity in infiltrating phagocytes | 25.0 | |
*LCA: Leucocyte common antigen (CD45)
Figure 5a) Anti-CD20 (B-cell) antigen immunoperoxidase reactivity in DLBCL; note the granular cytoplasmic reactivity (brown) in all malignant cells [black arrows] while a macrophage did not stain [blue arrow] (× 200). (b) Anti-CD3 (T-cell) antigen immunoperoxidase reactivity in DLBCL; note the brown focal cytoplasmic reactivity in tumor infiltrating T-lymphocytes [black arrows] while the malignant cells were not reactive [blue arrows] (× 400). (c) Anti-CD68 antigen immunoperoxidase reactivity in DLBCL; note the brown cytoplasmic reactivity in tumor infiltrating macrophages [black arrow] while malignant cells did not stain [blue arrow] (× 400). (d) Anti-Ki-67 (proliferation) antigen immunoperoxidase reactivity in an aggressive lymphoma: note the brown granular nuclear reactivity in proliferating cells [black arrows] including the abnormal mitotic bodies [blue arrows] (× 400).