Literature DB >> 18577193

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, treatment modifications and pharmacoeconomic properties.

Alan F Cruess1, Gergana Zlateva, Andreas M Pleil, Barbara Wirostko.   

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin has been used less comprehensively in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and specifically of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), since the advent of antiangiogenic therapies. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in PDT as an adjunct to these and other agents in the treatment of neovascular AMD. In light of this new development and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency's (EMEA) recent labelling decision to rescind approval for the use of PDT in occult CNV lesions, the present systematic review was undertaken to revisit the evidence supporting its clinical application. Photodynamic therapy provided the first pharmacological treatment for patients suffering from subfoveal CNV, the major cause of severe vision loss in AMD. Key clinical trials evaluating efficacy and safety have examined patients with all lesion subtypes, with the primary labelled indication (i.e. lesions containing a classic component of > or = 50% ) deriving from the results of the Treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study. The subsequent TAP Study Group post hoc categorization of lesions as predominantly classic is open to question, however, as it appears that the overall efficacy in this group only may have reflected the especially strong response in 100% classic lesions. Based on a subgroup analysis of the Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy Study, the indication for PDT subsequently was expanded in some jurisdictions, including that of the EMEA, to include occult lesions with no classic component. However, the subsequent Visudyne in Occult Study found no benefit in 100% occult lesions, resulting in the EMEA rescinding its approval for this indication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18577193     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01218.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  20 in total

1.  Can nanotechnology potentiate photodynamic therapy?

Authors:  Ying-Ying Huang; Sulbha K Sharma; Tianhong Dai; Hoon Chung; Anastasia Yaroslavsky; Maria Garcia-Diaz; Julie Chang; Long Y Chiang; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanotechnol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.848

Review 2.  BODIPY dyes in photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Anyanee Kamkaew; Siang Hui Lim; Hong Boon Lee; Lik Voon Kiew; Lip Yong Chung; Kevin Burgess
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Structure-activity relationships of diphenyl-ether as protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors: insights from computational simulations.

Authors:  Ge-Fei Hao; Ying Tan; Ning-Xi Yu; Guang-Fu Yang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Combination approaches to potentiate immune response after photodynamic therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Tyler G St Denis; Kanza Aziz; Anam A Waheed; Ying-Ying Huang; Sulbha K Sharma; Pawel Mroz; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer and for Infections: What Is the Difference?

Authors:  Sulbha K Sharma; Pawel Mroz; Tianhong Dai; Ying-Ying Huang; Tyler G St Denis; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  The potential of nanomedicine therapies to treat neovascular disease in the retina.

Authors:  Krysten M Farjo; Jian-Xing Ma
Journal:  J Angiogenes Res       Date:  2010-10-08

7.  Interventions for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Are Practice Guidelines Based on Systematic Reviews?

Authors:  Kristina Lindsley; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth Ssemanda; Gianni Virgili; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Self-assembled liposomal nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Magesh Sadasivam; Pinar Avci; Gaurav K Gupta; Shanmugamurthy Lakshmanan; Rakkiyappan Chandran; Ying-Ying Huang; Raj Kumar; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Eur J Nanomed       Date:  2013-07

9.  OCT Angiography: An Upcoming Non-invasive Tool for Diagnosis of Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Luiz Roisman; Raquel Goldhardt
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2017-03-31

Review 10.  Shining light on nanotechnology to help repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Asheesh Gupta; Pinar Avci; Magesh Sadasivam; Rakkiyappan Chandran; Nivaldo Parizotto; Daniela Vecchio; Wanessa C M A de Melo; Tianhong Dai; Long Y Chiang; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 14.227

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.