Literature DB >> 18576185

AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment.

Rachel Ellaway1, Ken Masters.   

Abstract

In just a few years, e-learning has become part of the mainstream in medical education. While e-learning means many things to many people, at its heart it is concerned with the educational uses of technology. For the purposes of this guide, we consider the many ways that the information revolution has affected and remediated the practice of healthcare teaching and learning. Deploying new technologies usually introduces tensions, and e-learning is no exception. Some wish to use it merely to perform pre-existing activities more efficiently or faster. Others pursue new ways of thinking and working that the use of such technology affords them. Simultaneously, while education, not technology, is the prime goal (and for healthcare, better patient outcomes), we are also aware that we cannot always predict outcomes. Sometimes, we have to take risks, and 'see what happens.' Serendipity often adds to the excitement of teaching. It certainly adds to the excitement of learning. The use of technology in support of education is not, therefore, a causal or engineered set of practices; rather, it requires creativity and adaptability in response to the specific and changing contexts in which it is used. Medical Education, as with most fields, is grappling with these tensions; the AMEE Guide to e-Learning in Medical Education hopes to help the reader, whether novice or expert, navigate them. This Guide is presented both as an introduction to the novice, and as a resource to more experienced practitioners. It covers a wide range of topics, some in broad outline, and others in more detail. Each section is concluded with a brief 'Take Home Message' which serves as a short summary of the section. The Guide is divided into two parts. The first part introduces the basic concepts of e-learning, e-teaching, and e-assessment, and then focuses on the day-to-day issues of e-learning, looking both at theoretical concepts and practical implementation issues. The second part examines technical, management, social, design and other broader issues in e-learning, and it ends with a review of emerging forms and directions in e-learning in medical education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18576185     DOI: 10.1080/01421590802108331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  103 in total

1.  E-portfolio competency metadata: pilot study for a call to action.

Authors:  Sishir Rao; Andrew Swartz; Leila Obeid; Sevith Rao; Barbara Joyce; Sarah Whitehouse; Mathilda Horst; Jack Butler; Ryan Kinnen; Alexander Shepard; Ilan Rubinfeld
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Neurological teaching in times of crisis.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Biesalski; Isabelle von Kirchbauer; Friederike Schmidt-Graf
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-03

3.  Basic echocardiography for undergraduate students: a comparison of different peer-teaching approaches.

Authors:  G Gradl-Dietsch; A K Menon; A Gürsel; A Götzenich; N Hatam; A Aljalloud; S Schrading; F Hölzl; M Knobe
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  [Evaluation of an internet-based e-learning ophthalmology module for medical students].

Authors:  A Stahl; M Boeker; C Ehlken; H Agostini; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Building an online community to promote communication and collaborative learning between health professionals and young people who self-harm: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Christabel Owens; Siobhan Sharkey; Janet Smithson; Elaine Hewis; Tobit Emmens; Tamsin Ford; Ray Jones
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Interactive film scenes for tutor training in problem-based learning (PBL): dealing with difficult situations.

Authors:  Hans M Bosse; Soeren Huwendiek; Silvia Skelin; Michael Kirschfink; Christoph Nikendei
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  How to improve medical education website design.

Authors:  Stephen D Sisson; Felicia Hill-Briggs; David Levine
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Rapid transition to online teaching program during COVID-19 lockdown: Experience from a medical college of India.

Authors:  Amir Maroof Khan; Somdatta Patra; Piyush Gupta; Arun Kumar Sharma; Anil K Jain
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-03-31

9.  Introducing an online community into a clinical education setting: a pilot study of student and staff engagement and outcomes using blended learning.

Authors:  Kathleen Gray; Jacinta Tobin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Use of live interactive webcasting for an international postgraduate module in ehealth: case study evaluation.

Authors:  Ray B Jones; Inocencio Maramba; Maged N Kamel Boulos; Tara Alexander
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.