Svenja Happe1, Mechthild Vennemann, Stefan Evers, Klaus Berger. 1. Dept. of Clinical Neurophysiology, Klinikum Bremen-Ost/University of Göttingen, Züricher Strasse 40, 28325, Bremen, Germany. svenja.happe@klinikum-bremen-ost.de
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a frequent sleep disorder with a prevalence of 5% to 15% in Caucasian populations. Dopaminergic treatment is known to reduce sensorimotor RLS symptoms and is approved for RLS, but not all patients ask for treatment. About 2% to 3% of patients presenting to a primary care physician require RLS-specific treatment. The overall treatment preference of RLS sufferers, however, is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and treatment preference in patients with previously diagnosed and those with yet undiagnosed RLS in a population-based survey in Germany. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional health survey with face-to-face interviews with 1312 participants in the Dortmund Health Study. RLS was assessed with standardized, validated questions addressing the four minimal diagnostic criteria for RLS defined by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 25 to 75 years and were randomly selected from the city register. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of individuals with a known doctor diagnosis of RLS was 2.3%. In addition, 6.5% fulfilled the four minimal criteria but did not know about this diagnosis yielding an overall prevalence of 8.8%. Prevalence was higher in women (10.2%) and German descendents (9.2%) compared to men (7.1%) and migrants (6.7%). Almost 60% of all RLS cases reported symptoms at least once a week. 33.3% of cases with a known RLS diagnosis and 14.1 % with an unknown diagnosis had an RLS treatment wish. The latter is determined by knowledge of the diagnosis, daily symptoms, diabetes and sleep disturbance. CONCLUSION: About every fourth RLS case knows about the diagnosis and overall every fifth RLS case wishes medication to effectively reduce symptoms, corresponding to 1.6% of the whole study population.
STUDY OBJECTIVES:Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a frequent sleep disorder with a prevalence of 5% to 15% in Caucasian populations. Dopaminergic treatment is known to reduce sensorimotor RLS symptoms and is approved for RLS, but not all patients ask for treatment. About 2% to 3% of patients presenting to a primary care physician require RLS-specific treatment. The overall treatment preference of RLS sufferers, however, is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and treatment preference in patients with previously diagnosed and those with yet undiagnosed RLS in a population-based survey in Germany. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional health survey with face-to-face interviews with 1312 participants in the Dortmund Health Study. RLS was assessed with standardized, validated questions addressing the four minimal diagnostic criteria for RLS defined by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 25 to 75 years and were randomly selected from the city register. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of individuals with a known doctor diagnosis of RLS was 2.3%. In addition, 6.5% fulfilled the four minimal criteria but did not know about this diagnosis yielding an overall prevalence of 8.8%. Prevalence was higher in women (10.2%) and German descendents (9.2%) compared to men (7.1%) and migrants (6.7%). Almost 60% of all RLS cases reported symptoms at least once a week. 33.3% of cases with a known RLS diagnosis and 14.1 % with an unknown diagnosis had an RLS treatment wish. The latter is determined by knowledge of the diagnosis, daily symptoms, diabetes and sleep disturbance. CONCLUSION: About every fourth RLS case knows about the diagnosis and overall every fifth RLS case wishes medication to effectively reduce symptoms, corresponding to 1.6% of the whole study population.
Authors: Wayne Hening; Arthur S Walters; Richard P Allen; Jacques Montplaisir; Andrew Myers; Luigi Ferini-Strambi Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: B Högl; S Kiechl; J Willeit; M Saletu; B Frauscher; K Seppi; J Müller; G Rungger; A Gasperi; G Wenning; W Poewe Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-06-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Richard P Allen; Daniel Picchietti; Wayne A Hening; Claudia Trenkwalder; Arthur S Walters; Jacques Montplaisi Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Klaus Berger; Arnold von Eckardstein; Claudia Trenkwalder; Andreas Rothdach; Ralf Junker; Stephan Karl Weiland Journal: J Neurol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Jan Rémi; Thomas Pollmächer; Kai Spiegelhalder; Claudia Trenkwalder; Peter Young Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Anke C Winter; Klaus Berger; Robert J Glynn; Julie E Buring; J Michael Gaziano; Markus Schürks; Tobias Kurth Journal: Am J Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Alexander Jung; Andreas Huge; Gregor Kuhlenbäumer; Steffi Kempt; Tanja Seehafer; Stefan Evers; Klaus Berger; Martin Marziniak Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 3.575