BACKGROUND: Surveillance for transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance was conducted among drug-naive HIV-1-infected pregnant women in South Africa, where single-dose nevirapine has been in use since 2001 and a national antiretroviral treatment programme started in 2004. METHODS: All subjects were from the Gauteng Province and were part of the 2002 and 2004 annual antenatal HIV seroprevalence survey conducted by the South African National Department of Health. All subjects met the inclusion criteria as set out by the World Health Organisation guidelines for HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance surveillance (women <22 years of age and in first pregnancy). Genotyping was performed on viral RNA by sequencing the protease and reverse transcriptase genes. Samples were also tested for the K103N mutation using a highly sensitive allele-specific real-time PCR assay (AS-PCR). RESULTS: Of 128 eligible participants from 2002, 65 (51%) samples were successfully amplified. None of them had evidence of resistance mutations by genotyping or by AS-PCR. Of 117 eligible participants from 2004, 48 (41%) samples were successfully amplified. Of these, one had T69D and one had the K70R resistance mutation, to give a total of 2/48 (4.2%) participants with evidence of resistance mutations by genotyping. One sample that was wild-type by genotyping was positive for K103N by AS-PCR. All samples clustered phylogenetically with HIV-1 subtype C, the predominant subtype circulating in South Africa. CONCLUSIONS: Using the threshold survey, resistance prevalence overall and for each drug class in 2002 and 2004 was <5% for the Gauteng province of South Africa. The detection of a low frequency of resistance mutations in the 2004 survey suggests that surveillance should be conducted annually among untreated populations to determine if this increases with time.
BACKGROUND: Surveillance for transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance was conducted among drug-naive HIV-1-infected pregnant women in South Africa, where single-dose nevirapine has been in use since 2001 and a national antiretroviral treatment programme started in 2004. METHODS: All subjects were from the Gauteng Province and were part of the 2002 and 2004 annual antenatal HIV seroprevalence survey conducted by the South African National Department of Health. All subjects met the inclusion criteria as set out by the World Health Organisation guidelines for HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance surveillance (women <22 years of age and in first pregnancy). Genotyping was performed on viral RNA by sequencing the protease and reverse transcriptase genes. Samples were also tested for the K103N mutation using a highly sensitive allele-specific real-time PCR assay (AS-PCR). RESULTS: Of 128 eligible participants from 2002, 65 (51%) samples were successfully amplified. None of them had evidence of resistance mutations by genotyping or by AS-PCR. Of 117 eligible participants from 2004, 48 (41%) samples were successfully amplified. Of these, one had T69D and one had the K70R resistance mutation, to give a total of 2/48 (4.2%) participants with evidence of resistance mutations by genotyping. One sample that was wild-type by genotyping was positive for K103N by AS-PCR. All samples clustered phylogenetically with HIV-1 subtype C, the predominant subtype circulating in South Africa. CONCLUSIONS: Using the threshold survey, resistance prevalence overall and for each drug class in 2002 and 2004 was <5% for the Gauteng province of South Africa. The detection of a low frequency of resistance mutations in the 2004 survey suggests that surveillance should be conducted annually among untreated populations to determine if this increases with time.
Authors: Ziad El-Khatib; Anna Mia Ekstrom; Johanna Ledwaba; Lerato Mohapi; Fatima Laher; Alan Karstaedt; Salome Charalambous; Max Petzold; David Katzenstein; Lynn Morris Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-07-17 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Nellie Wadonda-Kabondo; Bethany L Hedt; Joep J van Oosterhout; Kundai Moyo; Eddie Limbambala; George Bello; Ben Chilima; Erik Schouten; Anthony Harries; Moses Massaquoi; Carol Porter; Ralf Weigel; Mina Hosseinipour; John Aberle-Grasse; Michael R Jordan; Storn Kabuluzi; Diane E Bennett Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Nellie Wadonda-Kabondo; Richard Banda; Kundai Moyo; Maurice M'bang'ombe; Mabvuto Chiwaula; Carol Porter; Michael R Jordan Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Salim S Abdool Karim; Janet A Frohlich; Anneke C Grobler; Cheryl Baxter; Leila E Mansoor; Ayesha B M Kharsany; Sengeziwe Sibeko; Koleka P Mlisana; Zaheen Omar; Tanuja N Gengiah; Silvia Maarschalk; Natasha Arulappan; Mukelisiwe Mlotshwa; Lynn Morris; Douglas Taylor Journal: Science Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Matt A Price; Carole L Wallis; Shabir Lakhi; Etienne Karita; Anatoli Kamali; Omu Anzala; Eduard J Sanders; Linda-Gail Bekker; Rogers Twesigye; Eric Hunter; Pontiano Kaleebu; Kayitesi Kayitenkore; Susan Allen; Eugene Ruzagira; Mary Mwangome; Gaudensia Mutua; Pauli N Amornkul; Gwynn Stevens; Sergei L K Pond; Malinda Schaefer; Mary A Papathanasopoulos; Wendy Stevens; Jill Gilmour Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Ivana Grgic; Snjezana Zidovec Lepej; Maja M Lunar; Mario Poljak; Adriana Vince; Ivana Baca Vrakela; Ana Planinic; Katja Seme; Josip Begovac Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Amin S Hassan; Shalton M Mwaringa; Clare A Obonyo; Helen M Nabwera; Eduard J Sanders; Tobias F Rinke de Wit; Patricia A Cane; James A Berkley Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 2.205