R V Hakobyan1, G G Mkhoyan. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia. remyhakob@yahoo.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Surgical decompression is a lifesaving procedure in patients with severe intraabdominal hypertension. However, it involves subsequent management of an open abdomen. Therefore, it is not recommended for moderate intra-abdominal hypertension. Our literature search did not show any studies relating the efficacy of epidural analgesia in decreasing elevated intraabdominal pressure (IAP) in critically-ill surgical patients with primary intra-abdominal hypertension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Through a blinded prospective study, we investigated postoperative critically-ill surgical and trauma patients with primary intra-abdominal hypertension, who receivedpostoperative thoracic epidural analgesia (n = 58) or intravenous opioid analgesia (n = 130). Patients in the epidural group received ropivacaine 0.2% 10 ml, followed by an infusion of 5 ml/h for 96 hours. Patients in the opioid group could receive morphine hydrochloride (0.1 mg/kg IV for every 4-6 hours as needed) with or without ketorolac trometamol (up to 90 mg/day IV). IAP was measured transvesically, for every 6 hours. Additionally, measurements immediately before and 1 hour after the initiation of epidural analgesia were taken. Abdominal Perfusion Pressure (APP) was calculated for each IAP measurement as APP = MAP - IAP where MAP is the mean arterial pressure. RESULTS: In the epidural group we found a consistent decrease in IAP from 16.82 +/- 4.56 to 6.30 +/- 3.11 mmHg and an increase in APP from 60.26 +/- 21.893 to 76.10 +/- 17.54 mmHg between baseline values until the second day of epidural analgesia, which remained stable afterwards. There were no significant differences of IAP and APP in the opioid group. CONCLUSION: Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia decreases IAP and improves APP without haemodynamic compromise in postoperative critically-ill patients with primary intra-abdominal hypertension.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Surgical decompression is a lifesaving procedure in patients with severe intraabdominal hypertension. However, it involves subsequent management of an open abdomen. Therefore, it is not recommended for moderate intra-abdominal hypertension. Our literature search did not show any studies relating the efficacy of epidural analgesia in decreasing elevated intraabdominal pressure (IAP) in critically-ill surgical patients with primary intra-abdominal hypertension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Through a blinded prospective study, we investigated postoperative critically-ill surgical and traumapatients with primary intra-abdominal hypertension, who received postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia (n = 58) or intravenous opioid analgesia (n = 130). Patients in the epidural group received ropivacaine 0.2% 10 ml, followed by an infusion of 5 ml/h for 96 hours. Patients in the opioid group could receive morphine hydrochloride (0.1 mg/kg IV for every 4-6 hours as needed) with or without ketorolac trometamol (up to 90 mg/day IV). IAP was measured transvesically, for every 6 hours. Additionally, measurements immediately before and 1 hour after the initiation of epidural analgesia were taken. Abdominal Perfusion Pressure (APP) was calculated for each IAP measurement as APP = MAP - IAP where MAP is the mean arterial pressure. RESULTS: In the epidural group we found a consistent decrease in IAP from 16.82 +/- 4.56 to 6.30 +/- 3.11 mmHg and an increase in APP from 60.26 +/- 21.893 to 76.10 +/- 17.54 mmHg between baseline values until the second day of epidural analgesia, which remained stable afterwards. There were no significant differences of IAP and APP in the opioid group. CONCLUSION: Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia decreases IAP and improves APP without haemodynamic compromise in postoperative critically-ill patients with primary intra-abdominal hypertension.
Authors: M James Lozada; Varun Goyal; Danielle Levin; Rachel L Walden; Sarah S Osmundson; Luis D Pacheco; Manu L N G Malbrain Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Annika Reintam Blaser; Manu L N G Malbrain; Joel Starkopf; Sonja Fruhwald; Stephan M Jakob; Jan De Waele; Jan-Peter Braun; Martijn Poeze; Claudia Spies Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Konstantin A Popugaev; Ivan A Savin; Andrew U Lubnin; Alexander S Goriachev; Boris A Kadashev; Pavel L Kalinin; Andrew V Oshorov; Alexander A Polupan; Ekaterina U Sokolova; Maxim A Kutin; Valeriy I Lukianov Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 6.925