Kurt P Tschopp1, Esther G Thomaser. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Liestal, Liestal, Switzerland. kurt.tschopp@ksli.ch
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has found widespread use in functional endonasal sinus surgery (FESS) over the past few years. The present study investigates if CAS leads to a better outcome in FESS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who underwent endonasal sphenoethmoidectomy were enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized case-control study. The procedures were done without CAS (group A) in 2003 and with CAS (group B) in 2004, using a Stryker navigation unit. Sixty-two patients (113 sphenoidectomies) were included in group A and 61 patients (109 sphenoidectomies) in group B. The underlying disease was recurrent chronic sinusitis or polyposis nasi in all patients except for inverted papilloma in one patient from group A and in two patients from group B. The follow-up period was 12 months. Symptom scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively, using a questionnaire. A CT-scan was obtained in all patients preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between group A and B, neither with respect to symptom scores at 12 months postoperatively, nor in postoperative CT-scans. The operation strategy did not change by the introduction of CAS. The frontal sinuses were entered in group A and B in 59% and 64% of the patients, respectively. All parameters improved significantly postoperatively, compared to the preoperative values. As far as complications are concerned, two anterior orbital injuries and one retrobulbar haematoma occurred in group A and one postoperative lacrimal stenosis in group B. CONCLUSIONS: CAS does not lead to a better clinical outcome in FESS. Our data suggest that the rate of complications may be reduced using CAS. However, studies with a much larger number of patients would be necessary in order to definitely answer the question of whether CAS reduce complications in FESS.
INTRODUCTION: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has found widespread use in functional endonasal sinus surgery (FESS) over the past few years. The present study investigates if CAS leads to a better outcome in FESS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who underwent endonasal sphenoethmoidectomy were enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized case-control study. The procedures were done without CAS (group A) in 2003 and with CAS (group B) in 2004, using a Stryker navigation unit. Sixty-two patients (113 sphenoidectomies) were included in group A and 61 patients (109 sphenoidectomies) in group B. The underlying disease was recurrent chronic sinusitis or polyposis nasi in all patients except for inverted papilloma in one patient from group A and in two patients from group B. The follow-up period was 12 months. Symptom scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively, using a questionnaire. A CT-scan was obtained in all patients preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between group A and B, neither with respect to symptom scores at 12 months postoperatively, nor in postoperative CT-scans. The operation strategy did not change by the introduction of CAS. The frontal sinuses were entered in group A and B in 59% and 64% of the patients, respectively. All parameters improved significantly postoperatively, compared to the preoperative values. As far as complications are concerned, two anterior orbital injuries and one retrobulbar haematoma occurred in group A and one postoperative lacrimal stenosis in group B. CONCLUSIONS: CAS does not lead to a better clinical outcome in FESS. Our data suggest that the rate of complications may be reduced using CAS. However, studies with a much larger number of patients would be necessary in order to definitely answer the question of whether CAS reduce complications in FESS.
Authors: B A Stuck; C Bachert; P Federspil; W Hosemann; L Klimek; R Mösges; O Pfaar; C Rudack; H Sitter; M Wagenmann; R Weber; K Hörmann Journal: HNO Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: Aris I Giotakis; Florian Kral; Wolfgang Freysinger; Stefan Markart; Herbert Riechelmann Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Florian Kral; Oezguer Gueler; Martina Perwoeg; Zoltan Bardosi; Elisabeth J Puschban; Herbert Riechelmann; Wolfgang Freysinger Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Maximilian Linxweiler; Lukas Pillong; Dragan Kopanja; Jan P Kühn; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Julia C Radosa; Jingming Wang; Luc G T Morris; Basel Al Kadah; Florian Bochen; Sandrina Körner; Bernhard Schick Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2020-08-07
Authors: Marco Lai; Simon Skyrman; Caifeng Shan; Drazenko Babic; Robert Homan; Erik Edström; Oscar Persson; Gustav Burström; Adrian Elmi-Terander; Benno H W Hendriks; Peter H N de With Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 3.240