OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery on health related quality of life (HRQOL) in post-menopausal women. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Women enrolled in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS). PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and thirty-seven women (mean age 66.6) who had CABG surgery while enrolled in HERS. MEASUREMENTS: Physical function was assessed using the 12-item Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), energy-fatigue with the four-item RAND scale, and mental health with the RAND mental health inventory each year. We defined baseline HRQOL from the interview that preceded the CABG (mean 4.6 months pre-CABG). To assess post-CABG HRQOL, we used the first interview that was obtained at least 6 months following the CABG (mean 11.5 months post-CABG). RESULTS: For all three measures of HRQOL, mean scores post-CABG were virtually identical to mean scores pre-CABG (mean pre and post scores were 20.8, 20.4 for physical function, 49.3, 49.2 for energy-fatigue, and 71.9 and 72.3 for mental health). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics and the expected temporal change in HRQOL, differences between pre and post-operative HRQOL remained minimal. However, on an individual patient level, there was significant variability in HRQOL outcomes. For example, while mean physical function scores changed little, 32% of women were at least moderately better (scores improved by at least 0.5 standard deviations) following surgery, while 26% were at least moderately worse (scores declined by at least 0.5 standard deviations). CONCLUSION: Following CABG surgery in post-menopausal women, on average, HRQOL is virtually identical to the pre-operative baseline. However, there is significant variability, as substantial numbers of women are significantly better or significantly worse.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery on health related quality of life (HRQOL) in post-menopausal women. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING:Women enrolled in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS). PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and thirty-seven women (mean age 66.6) who had CABG surgery while enrolled in HERS. MEASUREMENTS: Physical function was assessed using the 12-item Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), energy-fatigue with the four-item RAND scale, and mental health with the RAND mental health inventory each year. We defined baseline HRQOL from the interview that preceded the CABG (mean 4.6 months pre-CABG). To assess post-CABG HRQOL, we used the first interview that was obtained at least 6 months following the CABG (mean 11.5 months post-CABG). RESULTS: For all three measures of HRQOL, mean scores post-CABG were virtually identical to mean scores pre-CABG (mean pre and post scores were 20.8, 20.4 for physical function, 49.3, 49.2 for energy-fatigue, and 71.9 and 72.3 for mental health). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics and the expected temporal change in HRQOL, differences between pre and post-operative HRQOL remained minimal. However, on an individual patient level, there was significant variability in HRQOL outcomes. For example, while mean physical function scores changed little, 32% of women were at least moderately better (scores improved by at least 0.5 standard deviations) following surgery, while 26% were at least moderately worse (scores declined by at least 0.5 standard deviations). CONCLUSION: Following CABG surgery in post-menopausal women, on average, HRQOL is virtually identical to the pre-operative baseline. However, there is significant variability, as substantial numbers of women are significantly better or significantly worse.
Authors: J S Rumsfeld; D J Magid; M O'Brien; M McCarthy; S MaWhinney; A L Shroyer; T E Moritz; W G Henderson; G K Sethi; F L Grover; K E Hammermeister Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Deborah Grady; David Herrington; Vera Bittner; Roger Blumenthal; Michael Davidson; Mark Hlatky; Judith Hsia; Stephen Hulley; Alan Herd; Steven Khan; L Kristin Newby; David Waters; Eric Vittinghoff; Nanette Wenger Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: S Chocron; J P Etievent; J F Viel; A Dussaucy; F Clement; K Alwan; M Neidhardt; N Schipman Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Laura P Sands; Kristine Yaffe; Kenneth Covinsky; Mary-Margaret Chren; Steven Counsell; Robert Palmer; Richard Fortinsky; C Seth Landefeld Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kenneth E Covinsky; Robert M Palmer; Richard H Fortinsky; Steven R Counsell; Anita L Stewart; Denise Kresevic; Christopher J Burant; C Seth Landefeld Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Noha El-Baz; Daniela Ondusova; Martin Studencan; Jaroslav Rosenberger; Sijmen A Reijneveld; Jitse P van Dijk; Berrie Middel Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 3.908