Literature DB >> 18573779

Telephone assessment increases uptake of colonoscopy in a FOBT colorectal cancer-screening programme.

J Rodger1, R J C Steele.   

Abstract

In faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening for colorectal cancer, face-to-face consultation for pre-colonoscopy assessment has significant resource implications. For this reason, providing the option of telephone interview for this purpose was evaluated. In the second year of the third round of screening in Tayside, all FOBT-positive individuals were offered pre-colonoscopy assessment by means of telephone interview. This was evaluated by comparing the results with those obtained in the first year, when only face-to-face consultation was available. Of 388 individuals offered the choice of telephone interview or face-to-face consultation, 330 (85.1%) chose telephone interview, and all but two of the remainder underwent face-to-face consultation. When compared with the preceding year, there was a highly significant reduction in the numbers not attending for colonoscopy (0.8% versus 14.9%, P < 0.0001) Telephone interview is an acceptable form of pre-colonoscopy assessment for the majority of FOBT-positive participants in a colorectal screening programme, and the policy of offering this approach is associated with a marked reduction in the colonoscopy default rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18573779     DOI: 10.1258/jms.2008.007093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  9 in total

1.  Telephone reminder call in addition to mailing notification improved the acceptance rate of colonoscopy in patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Hyun Phil Shin; Jae Jun Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Margriet C de Haan; Esther M Stoop; Marije Deutekom; Paul Fockens; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Maarten Thomeer; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Monique E van Leerdam; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Factors related to bowel cleansing failure before colonoscopy: Results of the PACOME study.

Authors:  Gaëlle Hautefeuille; Jean Lapuelle; Stanislas Chaussade; Thierry Ponchon; B Richard Molard; Pierre Coulom; René Laugier; Franck Henri; Guillaume Cadiot
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christine Baumgartner; Theodore R Levin; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Joanne Schottinger; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Preassessment Interview Improves the Efficacy and Safety of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hari Padmanabhan; Alexander Rothnie; Andy Higgins; Amandeep Grewal; Katherine Arndtz; Alan M Nevill; Matthew J Brookes; Ray Mathew
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-27

6.  Fecal Occult Blood Test Results of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in South Korea (2006-2013).

Authors:  John Hoon Rim; Taemi Youk; Jung Gu Kang; Byung Kyu Park; Heon Yung Gee; Jeong-Ho Kim; Jongha Yoo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Face-to-face vs telephone pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer screening; a randomised trial.

Authors:  E M Stoop; T R de Wijkerslooth; P M Bossuyt; J Stoker; P Fockens; E J Kuipers; E Dekker; M E van Leerdam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Socioeconomic variation in uptake of colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test result: a retrospective analysis of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  S Morris; G Baio; E Kendall; C von Wagner; J Wardle; W Atkin; S P Halloran; G Handley; R F Logan; A Obichere; S Rainbow; S Smith; J Snowball; R Raine
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Prospective analysis of factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in actual clinical practice.

Authors:  Dae Hyung Woo; Kyeong Ok Kim; Da Eun Jeong; Yoon Jeong Nam; Si Hyung Lee; Byung Ik Jang; Tae Nyeun Kim
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2018-04-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.