Literature DB >> 18573767

Pay for performance in Australia: Queensland's new Clinical Practice Improvement Payment.

Stephen Duckett1, Sandra Daniels, Maarten Kamp, Alexis Stockwell, Gary Walker, Michael Ward.   

Abstract

Following a high profile scandal relating to quality and safety of care, the health authority in the Australian state of Queensland introduced a pay for performance (P4P) component into its new hospital prospective payment system. The Clinical Practice Improvement Payment system pays hospitals for achievement of clinical process indicators. Initially the focus is on the quality of clinical processes and outcomes. Using a consensus approach involving consultation with clinicians, seven clinical indicators were adopted for 2007-2008. The first payments using pay for performance were made for work carried out up until June 2008. Although no data exist yet as to the impact of the new system, pay for performance appears to be gaining widespread, if somewhat reluctant, acceptance.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18573767     DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  2 in total

1.  Pay for performance system in Turkey and the world; a global overview.

Authors:  İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner; Ebru Esen; Ahmet Deniz Uçar; Ahmet Serdar Karaca; Ahmet Çınar Yastı
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2022-03-28

2.  Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs.

Authors:  Frank Eijkenaar
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-09-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.