Mikael Naess1. 1. Intensive Coronary Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo N-0407, Norway. mins@uus.no
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A "Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation" (DNAR)-order can be ordered for a critically ill coronary patient. One question that arises is whether the patient should be informed about the DNAR-decision? The purpose of the present study was to investigate attitudes and experiences towards DNAR-orders of nurses working in Intensive Coronary Care Units (ICCUs) in Norway. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 60% (176/295). A total of 74% of the respondents thought the patient should be informed about a DNAR-order. Given a mentally competent and conscious patient, 50% answered that they "to a relatively high" or "a very high degree" had experienced non-informed patients with a DNAR-order. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a positive attitude among respondents to inform patients about a DNAR-order. However, one half of the respondents had experienced that this information was not given. There may be several explanations for this discrepancy. Patients are treated individually and the right to know does not mean that every patient would want to know or needs to know. The timing of the information and the opportunity to provide it can also be a problem for such critically ill patients in the ICCU.
OBJECTIVE: A "Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation" (DNAR)-order can be ordered for a critically ill coronary patient. One question that arises is whether the patient should be informed about the DNAR-decision? The purpose of the present study was to investigate attitudes and experiences towards DNAR-orders of nurses working in Intensive Coronary Care Units (ICCUs) in Norway. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 60% (176/295). A total of 74% of the respondents thought the patient should be informed about a DNAR-order. Given a mentally competent and conscious patient, 50% answered that they "to a relatively high" or "a very high degree" had experienced non-informed patients with a DNAR-order. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a positive attitude among respondents to inform patients about a DNAR-order. However, one half of the respondents had experienced that this information was not given. There may be several explanations for this discrepancy. Patients are treated individually and the right to know does not mean that every patient would want to know or needs to know. The timing of the information and the opportunity to provide it can also be a problem for such critically illpatients in the ICCU.
Authors: Eva Piscator; Therese Djärv; Katarina Rakovic; Emil Boström; Sune Forsberg; Martin J Holzmann; Johan Herlitz; Katarina Göransson Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2021-04-29