Literature DB >> 1857311

Cervical cancer screening: a comparison of recruitment strategies among older women.

H Mitchell1, S Hirst, J Cockburn, D J Reading, M P Staples, G Medley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of different recruitment strategies in encouraging older women to have a Papanicolaou (Pap) test.
DESIGN: A 2 x 2 factorial study.
SETTING: Two rural areas of Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10,620 persons aged between 40 and 69 years and designated as female on electoral lists.
INTERVENTIONS: A personal letter of invitation and a community-based campaign of 4 weeks' duration alone and in combination. A control group received no active intervention. OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of eligible women having a Pap test report issued by the Victorian Cytology Service during the 12 weeks after the intervention compared with the 12 weeks before the intervention, with an intervening two-week washout period.
RESULTS: The odds ratio of an eligible woman being screened during the intervention period relative to the pre-intervention period was 3.00 for women who were exposed to the campaign and sent the letter of invitation (95% confidence interval, 2.38-3.77, P less than 0.001), 1.86 for women who were exposed to the campaign (95% confidence interval, 1.49-2.33, P less than 0.001), 1.61 for women who were sent the letter of invitation (95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.92, P less than 0.001). The baseline was a control group who received no active intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Both personal invitation letters and community-based campaigns are effective in recruiting women for Pap test screening. Combined strategies are more effective than single strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1857311     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1991.tb142130.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S K Buehler; W L Parsons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

Review 3.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 4.  Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Camilloni; Eliana Ferroni; Beatriz Jimenez Cendales; Annamaria Pezzarossi; Giacomo Furnari; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.