Literature DB >> 18572793

Action-oriented use of ergonomic checkpoints for healthy work design in different settings.

Kazutaka Kogi1.   

Abstract

Recent experiences in the action-oriented use of ergonomic checkpoints in different work settings are reviewed. The purpose is to know what features are useful for healthy work design adjusted to each local situation. Based on the review results, common features of ergonomic checkpoints used in participatory training programs for improving workplace conditions in small enterprises, construction sites, home work and agriculture in industrially developing countries in Asia are discussed. These checkpoints generally compile practical improvement options in a broad range of technical areas, such as materials handling, workstation design, physical environment and work organization. Usually, "action checklists" comprising the tiles of the checkpoints are used together. A clear focus is placed on readily applicable low-cost options. Three common features of these various checkpoints appear to be important. First, the checkpoints represent typical good practices in multiple areas. Second, each how-to section of these checkpoints presents simple improvements reflecting basic ergonomic principles. Examples of these principles include easy reach, fewer and faster transport, elbow-level work, coded displays, isolated or screened hazards and shared teamwork. Third, the illustrated checkpoints accompanied by corresponding checklists are used as group work tools in short-term training courses. Many practical improvements achieved are displayed in websites for inter-country work improvement networks. It is suggested to promote the use of locally adjusted checkpoints in various forms of participatory action-oriented training in small-scale workplaces and in agriculture particularly in industrially developing countries.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18572793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)        ISSN: 0300-8134


  2 in total

1.  Development and application of an innovative instrument to assess work environment factors for injury prevention in the food service industry.

Authors:  Pia Markkanen; Susan E Peters; Michael Grant; Jack T Dennerlein; Gregory R Wagner; Lisa Burke; Lorraine Wallace; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Work       Date:  2021

2.  Utility of action checklists as a consensus building tool.

Authors:  Yeon-Ha Kim; Etsuko Yoshikawa; Toru Yoshikawa; Kazutaka Kogi; Moon-Hee Jung
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 2.179

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.