RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The magnitude of iron-induced susceptibility changes in gradient echo T2*-weighted magnet resonance imaging (T2* MRI) increases with the field strength and should increase the sensitivity for detection of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) at 3.0 T. To test these hypotheses, we prospectively examined individuals with documented CMBs at 1.5 and 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred fifty elderly individuals, who participated in an interdisciplinary study of healthy aging, were examined at 3.0 T using T2* MRI sequences (repetition time [TR]/echo time [TE]/flip angle [FA] = 573 ms/16 ms/18 degrees ). Individuals positive for CMBs were asked to undergo an additional examination at 1.5 T (TR/TE/FA = 663 ms/23 ms/18 degrees ). Images were analyzed independently by two observers. CMBs were counted throughout the brain and were qualitatively analyzed comparing the degree of visible hypointensity on a 5-point scale from 1 (complete signal loss) to 5 (no detection) for both field strengths. Contrast-to-noise ratio of CMBs to surrounding brain tissue was calculated. RESULTS: At 3.0 T, CMBs were detected in 45 of 550 individuals; 25 agreed to an additional examination at 1.5 T. In this group (n = 25), a total of 53 CMBs were detected at 3.0 T, compared to 41 CMBs at 1.5 T. The mean contrast-to-noise ratio of CMBs was significantly increased at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T (27.4 +/- 8.2 vs. 17.4 +/- 8.0; p < .001). On qualitative analysis, visibility of CMBs was ranked significantly higher at 3.0 T (1.3 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.9 +/- 1.1; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Evidence of past microbleeds may even be found in neurologically normal elderly individuals by MRI. Detection rate and visibility of CMBs benefit from the higher field strength, resulting in a significantly improved depiction of iron-containing brain structures (CMBs) at 3.0 T with potential clinical relevance.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The magnitude of iron-induced susceptibility changes in gradient echo T2*-weighted magnet resonance imaging (T2* MRI) increases with the field strength and should increase the sensitivity for detection of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) at 3.0 T. To test these hypotheses, we prospectively examined individuals with documented CMBs at 1.5 and 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred fifty elderly individuals, who participated in an interdisciplinary study of healthy aging, were examined at 3.0 T using T2* MRI sequences (repetition time [TR]/echo time [TE]/flip angle [FA] = 573 ms/16 ms/18 degrees ). Individuals positive for CMBs were asked to undergo an additional examination at 1.5 T (TR/TE/FA = 663 ms/23 ms/18 degrees ). Images were analyzed independently by two observers. CMBs were counted throughout the brain and were qualitatively analyzed comparing the degree of visible hypointensity on a 5-point scale from 1 (complete signal loss) to 5 (no detection) for both field strengths. Contrast-to-noise ratio of CMBs to surrounding brain tissue was calculated. RESULTS: At 3.0 T, CMBs were detected in 45 of 550 individuals; 25 agreed to an additional examination at 1.5 T. In this group (n = 25), a total of 53 CMBs were detected at 3.0 T, compared to 41 CMBs at 1.5 T. The mean contrast-to-noise ratio of CMBs was significantly increased at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T (27.4 +/- 8.2 vs. 17.4 +/- 8.0; p < .001). On qualitative analysis, visibility of CMBs was ranked significantly higher at 3.0 T (1.3 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.9 +/- 1.1; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Evidence of past microbleeds may even be found in neurologically normal elderly individuals by MRI. Detection rate and visibility of CMBs benefit from the higher field strength, resulting in a significantly improved depiction of iron-containing brain structures (CMBs) at 3.0 T with potential clinical relevance.
Authors: Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Clifford R Jack; Sandra E Black; Matthew P Frosch; Steven M Greenberg; Bradley T Hyman; Philip Scheltens; Maria C Carrillo; William Thies; Martin M Bednar; Ronald S Black; H Robert Brashear; Michael Grundman; Eric R Siemers; Howard H Feldman; Rachel J Schindler Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: François De Guio; Eric Jouvent; Geert Jan Biessels; Sandra E Black; Carol Brayne; Christopher Chen; Charlotte Cordonnier; Frank-Eric De Leeuw; Martin Dichgans; Fergus Doubal; Marco Duering; Carole Dufouil; Emrah Duzel; Franz Fazekas; Vladimir Hachinski; M Arfan Ikram; Jennifer Linn; Paul M Matthews; Bernard Mazoyer; Vincent Mok; Bo Norrving; John T O'Brien; Leonardo Pantoni; Stefan Ropele; Perminder Sachdev; Reinhold Schmidt; Sudha Seshadri; Eric E Smith; Luciano A Sposato; Blossom Stephan; Richard H Swartz; Christophe Tzourio; Mark van Buchem; Aad van der Lugt; Robert van Oostenbrugge; Meike W Vernooij; Anand Viswanathan; David Werring; Frank Wollenweber; Joanna M Wardlaw; Hugues Chabriat Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Duangnapa Roongpiboonsopit; Hugo J Kuijf; Andreas Charidimou; Li Xiong; Anastasia Vashkevich; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Helen A Shih; Corey M Gill; Anand Viswanathan; Jorg Dietrich Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M M A Conijn; M I Geerlings; G-J Biessels; T Takahara; T D Witkamp; J J M Zwanenburg; P R Luijten; J Hendrikse Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Steven M Greenberg; Meike W Vernooij; Charlotte Cordonnier; Anand Viswanathan; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Steven Warach; Lenore J Launer; Mark A Van Buchem; Monique Mb Breteler Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: R N K Nandigam; A Viswanathan; P Delgado; M E Skehan; E E Smith; J Rosand; S M Greenberg; B C Dickerson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 3.825