Literature DB >> 18571818

Routine ultrasound examination during pregnancy: a world of possibilities.

Eva Molander1, Siw Alehagen, Carina M Berterö.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to identify and describe the meaning of the routine ultrasound scan to pregnant women.
DESIGN: a qualitative descriptive study using a grounded theory approach, with individual interviews to collect data.
SETTING: three antenatal clinics in a Swedish county of approximately 400,000 inhabitants. PARTICIPANTS: voluntary samples of 10 pregnant Swedish women, 26-38 years of age, were interviewed prior to their first routine ultrasound.
FINDINGS: 'making it possible' was the core category that explained and illustrated the meaning of the scan. The core category showed that the women considered the examination to be filled with possibilities to reach different goals during pregnancy. It also explained the categories: ultrasound as an event; ultrasound as a situation; ultrasound as a test; and the effects of ultrasound; as well as how they related to each other. The findings are considered the beginning of a theory concerning the meaning of the first ultrasound to pregnant women. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: pregnant women can see their first ultrasound as a tool that enables them to reach different goals during their pregnancy. Many of the goals concern meeting and connecting with the baby, suggesting that pregnant women consider the examination an important step towards parenthood. An ultrasound examination offered for medical reasons, which has other meanings than the intended for pregnant women, is important knowledge. It can be useful when giving information about the scan, addressing the woman during the examination, and for understanding and handling possible reactions. Copyright 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18571818     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  13 in total

1.  Technical Quality of Maternity Care: the Pregnant Women's Perspective.

Authors:  Andrew Wilson; Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi; Kamal Gholipour; Mostafa Farahbakhsh
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2013-06-30

2.  The Ghanaian woman's experience and perception of ultrasound use in antenatal care.

Authors:  Y B Mensah; K Nkyekyer; K Mensah
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2014-03

3.  Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections.

Authors:  Erin Floyd; Megan A Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Refugee and migrant women's views of antenatal ultrasound on the Thai Burmese border: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Marcus J Rijken; Mary Ellen Gilder; May Myo Thwin; Honey Moon Ladda Kajeechewa; Jacher Wiladphaingern; Khin Maung Lwin; Caroline Jones; François Nosten; Rose McGready
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Utilization of antenatal ultrasound scan and implications for caesarean section: a cross-sectional study in rural Eastern China.

Authors:  Kun Huang; Fangbiao Tao; Joanna Raven; Liu Liu; Xiaoyan Wu; Shenglan Tang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives' views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Ingrid Mogren; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Rhonda Small
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  'Ultrasound is an invaluable third eye, but it can't see everything': a qualitative study with obstetricians in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Margareta Persson; Ann Lalos; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  When fetal hydronephrosis is suspected antenatally--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marie Oscarsson; Tomas Gottvall; Katarina Swahnberg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Factors affecting the uptake of prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies; a multicentre prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Pieternel S Verhoeven; Judith Manniën; Linda Martin; Hans S Reinders; Evelien Spelten; Eileen K Hutton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Two sides of the same coin--an interview study of Swedish obstetricians' experiences using ultrasound in pregnancy management.

Authors:  Annika Åhman; Margareta Persson; Kristina Edvardsson; Ann Lalos; Sophie Graner; Rhonda Small; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.