Literature DB >> 18571617

Late exposure of the bioceramic orbital implant.

Jia-Kang Wang1, Pei-Ching Lai, Shu Lang Liao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term outcome of the Bioceramic orbital implant.
DESIGN: A retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized study.
METHODS: Data were collected from the patients receiving Bioceramic orbital implants at National Taiwan University Hospital between June 1, 2001 and November 1, 2005. The implant was wrapped with Vicryl mesh, adding anteriorly with a scleral patch graft following enucleation with primary or secondary implantation. The unwrapped implant was inserted into an eviscerated globe with posterior sclerotomy and cornea preserved. Primary or secondary placement of sleeve was performed in some patients.
RESULTS: A total of 112 cases were reviewed. Four patients were excluded attributable to insufficient follow-up. The other 108 patients had a mean follow-up period of 35.8 +/- 10.6 months (range, 24 to 70 months). Fifty patients (46.3%) received the pegging procedure. Eight of 108 (7.4%) cases of late exposure were identified on average 20.7 months after implantation. We identified no cases of implant exposure in 30 cases of enucleation and eight cases of secondary implant when the implant was wrapped in Vicryl mesh and an anterior scleral cap was used. All exposures developed in eviscerated patients (70 cases): two without pegging, three with primary placement, and three with secondary placement of the sleeve. The exposure rate was higher in patients with eviscerated globes, pegged implants, and prior ocular operations (P < .005).
CONCLUSIONS: Late exposures of Bioceramic implants were found after long-term follow-up, associated with evisceration, pegging, and prior ocular surgeries. The modified wrapping technique can prevent exposure following secondary implantation and enucleation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18571617     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  5 in total

1.  Comparative study of modified and conventional secondary hydroxyapatite orbital implantations.

Authors:  Yong Zhao; Mao-Nian Zhang; Yun-Xian Gao; Xiao-Wei Gao; Bing Ren
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Integrated versus non-integrated orbital implants for treating anophthalmic sockets.

Authors:  Silvana Schellini; Regina El Dib; Leandro Re Silva; Joyce G Farat; Yuqing Zhang; Eliane C Jorge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-07

3.  Four petals evisceration for atrophia bulbi.

Authors:  Molham A Elbakary
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Survey on the management of orbital and intraocular tumors among oculofacial surgeons in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Priscilla Xinhui Wang; Victor Teck Chang Koh; Katherine Lun; Gangadhara Sundar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Risk factors for orbital implant exposure after evisceration: A case control study of 93 patients.

Authors:  Roshmi Gupta; Parvathi Hari; Bhawna Khurana; Anjali Kiran
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.