BACKGROUND: The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay is a frequently used method to screen human sera for antibodies against influenza A viruses. Because HI has relatively poor sensitivity in detecting antibodies against avian influenza A strains, a more complicated microneutralization (MN) assay is often preferred. Recent research suggests that the sensitivity of the HI assay can be improved by switching from the traditionally used turkey, guinea pig, human, or chicken RBCs to horse RBCs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the horse RBC HI when screening for human antibodies against avian influenza types H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H9, H11, and H12. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated the reproducibility of horse RBC HI and its agreement with MN results using sera from people exposed or not exposed to wild and domestic birds. RESULTS: The horse RBC HI assay had high reliability (90%-100%) and good agreement with MN assay results (52%-100%). CONCLUSION: The horse RBC HI assay is reliable, less expensive, less complex, and faster than the MN assay. While MN will likely remain the gold standard serologic assay for avian viruses, the horse RBC HI assay may be very useful as a screening assay in large-scale epidemiologic studies.
BACKGROUND: The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay is a frequently used method to screen human sera for antibodies against influenza A viruses. Because HI has relatively poor sensitivity in detecting antibodies against avian influenza A strains, a more complicated microneutralization (MN) assay is often preferred. Recent research suggests that the sensitivity of the HI assay can be improved by switching from the traditionally used turkey, guinea pig, human, or chicken RBCs to horse RBCs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the horse RBC HI when screening for human antibodies against avian influenza types H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H9, H11, and H12. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated the reproducibility of horse RBC HI and its agreement with MN results using sera from people exposed or not exposed to wild and domestic birds. RESULTS: The horse RBC HI assay had high reliability (90%-100%) and good agreement with MN assay results (52%-100%). CONCLUSION: The horse RBC HI assay is reliable, less expensive, less complex, and faster than the MN assay. While MN will likely remain the gold standard serologic assay for avian viruses, the horse RBC HI assay may be very useful as a screening assay in large-scale epidemiologic studies.
Authors: Adam Meijer; Arnold Bosman; Esther E H M van de Kamp; Berry Wilbrink; Mirna Du Ry van Beest Holle; Marion Koopmans Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2005-11-03 Impact factor: 2.014
Authors: Tham Chi Dung; Pham Ngoc Dinh; Vu Sinh Nam; Luong Minh Tan; Nguyen Le Khanh Hang; Le Thi Thanh; Le Quynh Mai Journal: Western Pac Surveill Response J Date: 2014-11-18
Authors: R Colby Layton; Nikolai Petrovsky; Andrew P Gigliotti; Zemmie Pollock; Jennifer Knight; Nathaniel Donart; John Pyles; Kevin S Harrod; Peng Gao; Frederick Koster Journal: Vaccine Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Benjawan P Khuntirat; In-Kyu Yoon; Patrick J Blair; Whitney S Krueger; Malinee Chittaganpitch; Shannon D Putnam; Krongkaew Supawat; Robert V Gibbons; Sirima Pattamadilok; Pathom Sawanpanyalert; Gary L Heil; John A Friary; Ana W Capuano; Gregory C Gray Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Iain Stephenson; Alan Heath; Diane Major; Robert W Newman; Katja Hoschler; Wang Junzi; Jacqueline M Katz; Jerry P Weir; Maria C Zambon; John M Wood Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 6.883