Literature DB >> 18571415

Precise registration of gene expression boundaries by a repressive morphogen in Drosophila.

Danyang Yu1, Stephen Small.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Morphogen gradients are thought to create concentration thresholds that differentially position the expression boundaries of multiple target genes. Despite intensive study, it is still unclear how the concentration profiles within gradients are spatially related to the critical patterning thresholds they generate.
RESULTS: Here we use a combination of quantitative measurements and ectopic-misexpression experiments to examine the transcriptional-repression activities of the Hunchback (Hb) protein gradient in Drosophila embryos. Our results define five expression boundaries that are set primarily by differences in Hb concentration and two boundaries that are set by combinatorial mechanisms involving Hb and at least one other repressor.
CONCLUSIONS: Hb functions as a repressive morphogen, but only within a specific range of concentrations ( approximately 40% to approximately 4.4% of maximum Hb concentration), within which there are at least four distinct concentration thresholds. The lower limit of the range reflects a position where the slope of the gradient becomes too shallow for resolution by specific target genes. Concentrations above the upper limit do not contribute directly to differential-repression mechanisms, but they provide a robust source that permits proper functioning of the gradient in heterozygous embryos that contain only one functional hb gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18571415      PMCID: PMC2481289          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  53 in total

1.  Specifying positional information in the embryo: looking beyond morphogens.

Authors:  Michel Kerszberg; Lewis Wolpert
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Regulation of a segmentation stripe by overlapping activators and repressors in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  D Stanojevic; S Small; M Levine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Control of Drosophila body pattern by the hunchback morphogen gradient.

Authors:  G Struhl; P Johnston; P A Lawrence
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-04-17       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila.

Authors:  S Small; R Kraut; T Hoey; R Warrior; M Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  cis-acting control elements for Krüppel expression in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  M Hoch; C Schröder; E Seifert; H Jäckle
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  The giant gene of Drosophila encodes a b-ZIP DNA-binding protein that regulates the expression of other segmentation gap genes.

Authors:  M Capovilla; E D Eldon; V Pirrotta
Journal:  Development       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Mutually repressive interactions between the gap genes giant and Krüppel define middle body regions of the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  R Kraut; M Levine
Journal:  Development       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Gene expression mediated by cis-acting sequences of the Krüppel gene in response to the Drosophila morphogens bicoid and hunchback.

Authors:  M Hoch; E Seifert; H Jäckle
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Interactions of the Drosophila gap gene giant with maternal and zygotic pattern-forming genes.

Authors:  E D Eldon; V Pirrotta
Journal:  Development       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Sharp anterior boundary of homeotic gene expression conferred by the fushi tarazu protein.

Authors:  J Müller; M Bienz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  26 in total

1.  MAPK substrate competition integrates patterning signals in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Yoosik Kim; Mathieu Coppey; Rona Grossman; Leiore Ajuria; Gerardo Jiménez; Ze'ev Paroush; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  A sequence level model of an intact locus predicts the location and function of nonadditive enhancers.

Authors:  Kenneth A Barr; John Reinitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Positional information, in bits.

Authors:  Julien O Dubuis; Gasper Tkacik; Eric F Wieschaus; Thomas Gregor; William Bialek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multiple enhancers ensure precision of gap gene-expression patterns in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Michael W Perry; Alistair N Boettiger; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Shadow enhancers enable Hunchback bifunctionality in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Max V Staller; Ben J Vincent; Meghan D J Bragdon; Tara Lydiard-Martin; Zeba Wunderlich; Javier Estrada; Angela H DePace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  [Studies of stability mechanisms of early embryonal development of fruit fly Drosophila].

Authors:  S Iu Surkova; V V Gurskiĭ; J Reinitz; M G Samsonova
Journal:  Ontogenez       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

7.  Modulation of temporal dynamics of gene transcription by activator potency in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Junbo Liu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Adaptation of the length scale and amplitude of the Bicoid gradient profile to achieve robust patterning in abnormally large Drosophila melanogaster embryos.

Authors:  David Cheung; Cecelia Miles; Martin Kreitman; Jun Ma
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Anterior-posterior positional information in the absence of a strong Bicoid gradient.

Authors:  Amanda Ochoa-Espinosa; Danyang Yu; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Paolo Struffi; Stephen Small
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks.

Authors:  Gasper Tkacik; Aleksandra M Walczak; William Bialek
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.