Literature DB >> 1857139

Randomized, controlled trials using the Metro Firm System.

R D Cebul1.   

Abstract

The Firm System at MetroHealth Medical Center was begun almost two decades ago to foster improved continuity of patient care and teaching of medical students and residents in Internal Medicine. For the past 8 years, these parallel teams of providers and patients also have been used to conduct clinical, educational, and health care delivery research. Randomized, controlled trials are made possible by ongoing random assignment of patients and providers to the three teams, or small group practices. Each group practice has equivalent inpatient and outpatient areas supported by nonrotating nursing, paramedical, and clerical staff. The system's current relationships were established after a controlled trial established both decreased costs and increased effectiveness of the "group practice model" as compared to more traditional approaches to patient care by residents in an academic medical center. Other trials, both on the inpatient and outpatient settings, have been used to guide ongoing institutional change. The unique advantages of the randomized controlled trial are high-lighted by contrasting the results of within-group changes during an intervention with results that incorporate control group changes. A variety of methodologic and logistical issues must be addressed when conducting controlled trials that use ongoing randomization within a single institution. These include determination that the groups are equivalent for all important parameters preintervention, choosing an analytic approach that accounts for potential differences among providers and patients, and, in trials designed to affect behavior, assurance that a "steady state" exists prior to initiating another trial designed to affect similar behavior. Consideration also must be given to the possibilities of cross-team contamination, the Hawthorne effect, the "dominant attending effect," and ethical issues related to informed consent. Clinical trials in a single institution may be performed for common problems and those with well defined stages of severity. Since the costs of maintaining the ongoing randomization are relatively small, the incremental costs of conducting randomized controlled trials are low by comparison to traditional approaches. The establishment of analogous systems at other institutions will permit multisite trials for less common clinical problems, enhance the generalizability of findings, and permit new types of health services research, including the rigorous evaluation of practice guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1857139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

Review 1.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices.

Authors:  Sherri P Varnell; David M Murray; Jessica B Janega; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A clinic-based mammography intervention targeting inner-city women.

Authors:  V Taylor; B Thompson; D Lessler; Y Yasui; D Montano; K M Johnson; J Mahloch; M Mullen; S Li; G Bassett; H I Goldberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Effectiveness of collaborative care depression treatment in Veterans' Affairs primary care.

Authors:  Susan C Hedrick; Edmund F Chaney; Bradford Felker; Chuan-Fen Liu; Nicole Hasenberg; Patrick Heagerty; Jan Buchanan; Rocco Bagala; Diane Greenberg; Grady Paden; Stephan D Fihn; Wayne Katon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The effect of patient gender on the prevalence and recognition of alcoholism on a general medicine inpatient service.

Authors:  N V Dawson; G Dadheech; T Speroff; R L Smith; D S Schubert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Comparison of 3 Depression Screening Methods and Provider Referral in a Veterans Affairs Primary Care Clinic.

Authors:  Jonathan W. Kanter; Amee J. Epler; Edmund F. Chaney; Chaun-Fen Liu; Patrick Heagerty; Patricia Lin; Bradford Felker; Susan C. Hedrick
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12

6.  Engaging diverse underserved communities to bridge the mammography divide.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Ana Paula Cupertino; Christine M Daley; Trish Long; Angelia Cully; Matthew S Mayo; Edward F Ellerbeck; Mugur V Geana; Allen Greiner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Hospital ward design and prevention of hospital-acquired infections: A prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Ellison; Danielle Southern; Donna Holton; Elizabeth Henderson; Jean Wallace; Peter Faris; William A Ghali; John Conly
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.471

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.