Literature DB >> 18570987

A comparison study of periapical repair in dogs' teeth using RoekoSeal and AH plus root canal sealers: a histopathological evaluation.

Mário Roberto Leonardo1, Daniel Silva Herzog Flores, Francisco Wanderley Garcia de Paula E Silva, Renato de Toledo Leonardo, Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of RoekoSeal sealer Roeko (Dental Products, Langenau, Germany) with the periapical tissues of dogs and compare it with AH Plus sealer (Dentsply/De Trey, Konstanz, Germany). The pulps of 32 root canals were removed, the apical cementum layer perforated, the biomechanical preparation performed, and the root canals filled by lateral condensation technique. Ninety days after the surgery, the animals were euthanized, the bone with teeth removed, and the samples prepared for histopathological analysis. In group 1 (RoekoSeal Automix), deposition of mineralized tissue was observed, with complete newly mineralized apical formed tissue in 43.8% and partial sealing in 56.2%. In group 2 (AH Plus), in 12.5% there was complete newly mineralized apical formed tissue, in 75% the sealing was partial, and in 12.5% there was no sealing (p < 0.05). There were no differences between the groups in relation to the inflammatory infiltrate; thickness of the periodontal ligament; and the resorption of dentin, cementum or bone (p > 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18570987     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  6 in total

Review 1.  Ability of new obturation materials to improve the seal of the root canal system: a review.

Authors:  Guo-Hua Li; Li-Na Niu; Wei Zhang; Mark Olsen; Gustavo De-Deus; Ashraf A Eid; Ji-Hua Chen; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Comparing subcutaneous tissue responses to freshly mixed and set root canal sealers.

Authors:  Setareh Derakhshan; Alireza Adl; Masoud Parirokh; Fatemeh Mashadiabbas; Ali Akbar Haghdoost
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2009-10-10

3.  Influence of ultrasonics on the penetration depth of AH plus, acroseal, and EndoREZ root canal sealers: An in vitro study.

Authors:  P Krishna Prasad; Abhishek Sankhala; Aastha Tiwari; Shrikant Parakh; Gagan R Madan; Ankita Singh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

4.  In Vivo Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Healing in Response to a Calcium Silicate and Calcium Hydroxide Based Endodontic Sealers.

Authors:  Dalia Y Zaki; Mohamed H Zaazou; Maram E Khallaf; Tamer M Hamdy
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-15

Review 5.  Biocompatibility of Root Canal Sealers: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Diogo Afonso Fonseca; Anabela Baptista Paula; Carlos Miguel Marto; Ana Coelho; Siri Paulo; José Pedro Martinho; Eunice Carrilho; Manuel Marques Ferreira
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Laboratory study of tissue repair of resin-based endodontic sealers in critical surgical defects.

Authors:  Guilherme Ferreira da Silva; Letycia Accioly Simões Coelho; Vanessa Abreu Sanches Costa; Letícia Citelli Conti; Ana Carolina de Almeida Lima; Gabriela Cristina de Santi Sodré; Mateus Rinaldi Lucio Martins; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Rodrigo Ricci Vivan
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.144

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.