OBJECTIVE: Gene therapy represents a promising treatment for hepatic disease. Most approaches today use viral methods to target tissues. While nonviral gene therapy is less prominent, hydrodynamic gene delivery represents a promising approach to direct gene expression to the liver. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate promoters for efficient gene expression in hepatocytes in vivo by hydrodynamic delivery and to test the findings in a model of hemophilia A. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human cytomegalovirus (hCMV), chicken beta-actin/CMV enhancer (CAG), elongation factor-1 alpha (EF1alpha), and phosphoglycerokinase (PGK) promoters were subcloned into plasmids with a luciferase reporter gene. In vitro calcium phosphate-mediated transfection of 2 x 10(5) HEK 293 cells was followed by in vivo whole animal bioluminescence and luminometry after hydrodynamic tail vein injection of plasmid DNA. Six-month-old FVB factor VIII (FVIII)-deficient mice were similarly injected with CBA- or EF1alpha-promoted constructs containing the FVIII heavy and light chains and expression was examined. RESULTS: In vitro transfection demonstrated a hierarchy of expression: hCMV-intron>CAG>EF1alpha>hCMV>>PGK. In vivo luminometry demonstrated that the CAG construct produced 2.6x, 3.0x, 3.4x, and >1000x the expression of the hCMV-intron, EF1alpha, hCMV, and PGK constructs respectively. FVIII plasmid injected hemophilic mice demonstrated higher levels of FVIII expression with CAG versus EF1alpha, confirming the reporter gene studies. All FVIII-deficient mice injected with EF1alpha-FVIII or CAG-FVIII plasmids survived after tail clipping. CONCLUSIONS: The CAG promoter/enhancer combination is an excellent alternative to the human CMV promoter for hydrodynamic gene delivery to the liver.
OBJECTIVE: Gene therapy represents a promising treatment for hepatic disease. Most approaches today use viral methods to target tissues. While nonviral gene therapy is less prominent, hydrodynamic gene delivery represents a promising approach to direct gene expression to the liver. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate promoters for efficient gene expression in hepatocytes in vivo by hydrodynamic delivery and to test the findings in a model of hemophilia A. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Human cytomegalovirus (hCMV), chicken beta-actin/CMV enhancer (CAG), elongation factor-1 alpha (EF1alpha), and phosphoglycerokinase (PGK) promoters were subcloned into plasmids with a luciferase reporter gene. In vitro calcium phosphate-mediated transfection of 2 x 10(5) HEK 293 cells was followed by in vivo whole animal bioluminescence and luminometry after hydrodynamic tail vein injection of plasmid DNA. Six-month-old FVB factor VIII (FVIII)-deficient mice were similarly injected with CBA- or EF1alpha-promoted constructs containing the FVIII heavy and light chains and expression was examined. RESULTS: In vitro transfection demonstrated a hierarchy of expression: hCMV-intron>CAG>EF1alpha>hCMV>>PGK. In vivo luminometry demonstrated that the CAG construct produced 2.6x, 3.0x, 3.4x, and >1000x the expression of the hCMV-intron, EF1alpha, hCMV, and PGK constructs respectively. FVIII plasmid injected hemophilic mice demonstrated higher levels of FVIII expression with CAG versus EF1alpha, confirming the reporter gene studies. All FVIII-deficient mice injected with EF1alpha-FVIII or CAG-FVIII plasmids survived after tail clipping. CONCLUSIONS: The CAG promoter/enhancer combination is an excellent alternative to the human CMV promoter for hydrodynamic gene delivery to the liver.
Authors: M A Kay; P Baley; S Rothenberg; F Leland; L Fleming; K P Ponder; T Liu; M Finegold; G Darlington; W Pokorny Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-01-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: S Hacein-Bey-Abina; C Von Kalle; M Schmidt; M P McCormack; N Wulffraat; P Leboulch; A Lim; C S Osborne; R Pawliuk; E Morillon; R Sorensen; A Forster; P Fraser; J I Cohen; G de Saint Basile; I Alexander; U Wintergerst; T Frebourg; A Aurias; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; S Romana; I Radford-Weiss; F Gross; F Valensi; E Delabesse; E Macintyre; F Sigaux; J Soulier; L E Leiva; M Wissler; C Prinz; T H Rabbitts; F Le Deist; A Fischer; M Cavazzana-Calvo Journal: Science Date: 2003-10-17 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: H Yonemura; K Sugawara; K Nakashima; Y Nakahara; T Hamamoto; I Mimaki; K Yokomizo; Y Tajima; K Masuda; A Imaizumi Journal: Protein Eng Date: 1993-08
Authors: J W Fabre; A Grehan; M Whitehorne; G J Sawyer; X Dong; S Salehi; L Eckley; X Zhang; M Seddon; A M Shah; M Davenport; M Rela Journal: Gene Ther Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Jane Yuxia Qin; Li Zhang; Kayla L Clift; Imge Hulur; Andy Peng Xiang; Bing-Zhong Ren; Bruce T Lahn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eric K Hubner; Christian Lechler; Birgit Kohnke-Ertel; Anne-Flore Zmoos; Julien Sage; Roland M Schmid; Ursula Ehmer Journal: J Gene Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.152