Literature DB >> 18570019

High-frequency users of detoxification: who are they?

Maryann Amodeo1, Lena Lundgren, Deborah Chassler, Julie Witas.   

Abstract

Utilizing a longitudinal database (1996-2002) with all intake information from entries to all licensed drug treatment programs in Massachusetts (N = 27,801), this study examined factors associated with multiple detoxification admissions by injection drug users (IDUs). Four logistic regression models were developed. Although our hypothesis was that the highest frequency treatment users (in the 95th percentile) would be those in the detoxification-only group, this was incorrect: the highest frequency detoxification users were those most likely to use detoxification along with methadone maintenance, outpatient counseling, and/or residential treatment. Health insurance was a key factor. Study implications, limitations, and future research directions are noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18570019     DOI: 10.1080/10826080701800990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Subst Use Misuse        ISSN: 1082-6084            Impact factor:   2.164


  6 in total

1.  Comparing injection and non-injection routes of administration for heroin, methamphetamine, and cocaine users in the United States.

Authors:  Scott P Novak; Alex H Kral
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep

2.  Opioid maintenance treatment as a harm reduction tool for opioid-dependent individuals in New York City: the need to expand access to buprenorphine/naloxone in marginalized populations.

Authors:  Sharon Stancliff; Herman Joseph; Chunki Fong; Terry Furst; Sandra D Comer; Perrine Roux
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  2012

3.  A performance measure for continuity of care after detoxification: relationship with outcomes.

Authors:  Margaret T Lee; Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Andrea Acevedo; Lee Panas; Grant A Ritter; Robert Dunigan; Hermik Babakhanlou-Chase; Alfred Bidorini; Kevin Campbell; Karin Haberlin; Alice Huber; Dawn Lambert-Wacey; Tracy Leeper; Mark Reynolds
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-05-02

4.  Impact of Agency Receipt of Incentives and Reminders on Engagement and Continuity of Care for Clients With Co-Occurring Disorders.

Authors:  Margaret T Lee; Andrea Acevedo; Deborah W Garnick; Constance M Horgan; Lee Panas; Grant A Ritter; Kevin M Campbell
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Factors associated with high use of general practitioner and psychiatrist services among patients attending an addiction rehabilitation center.

Authors:  Christophe Huỳnh; André Ngamini Ngui; Sylvia Kairouz; Alain Lesage; Marie-Josée Fleury
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Evaluating the feasibility and impact of case rate payment for recovery support navigator services: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Maria E Torres; Mary Brolin; Lee Panas; Grant Ritter; Dominic Hodgkin; Margaret Lee; Elizabeth Merrick; Constance Horgan; Jonna C Hopwood; Andrea Gewirtz; Natasha De Marco; Nancy Lane
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.